When it comes to taking any decisions on  education, even a visionary  human resource development minister like Kapil Sibal has to contend with the slow and time-consuming process of decision-making.

The need for de-stressing the transition from secondary schools to graduate programmes in engineering is something everyone agrees on. But the way to reduce multiplicity of exams has eluded the Council of Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs). The stress for students starts much before it is time to take the IIT-Joint Entrance Examination (JEE) and such other exams.

Anecdotally, we know that the student stress levels climb up in the final years of school and peak as they go through multiple admission tests. Some test the ability to apply principles of science while others are purely objective type but with negative marking for incorrect answers. Some use computers while others use machine readable answer sheets with correct answers to be blackened with an HB pencil. The stress levels across the country just refuse to die down even with multiple counselling sessions.

Let us not forget that the biggest stress for a general category student is that only 45 percent of the total seats are available to him/ her, the rest being reserved.

Even though academicians and policymakers agree on the urgent need to ‘de-stress’ young Indians, no consensus could still be reached on the recommendations of the IIT Kharagpur director Damodar Acharya Committee on the way to reduce multiple entrance tests. The IIT directors now face an unresolved issue of how much weightage to give to the Class 12 exam and a new proposed entrance exam.

As the clamour to do away with the IIT-JEE exam mounts, they have made clear their unwillingness to do so. The task of finding an acceptable alternative has now been entrusted to yet another committee headed by science and technology department secretary T. Ramasami. The new group will assess the examination and admission system for engineering programmes. It appears that Ramasami’s group has a ‘limited mandate’ - do everything except doing away with the IIT-JEE examination.

Here are three suggestions for the committee:

First, allow IIT directors to get off the IIT-JEE hobby horses and kill the cram schools.

Second, do not re-invent the wheel.

Third, look at what has been tried, tested, practised and working right here in India and follow that.

Let me elaborate on the third one:

• Treat the young Indian as the key customer and design a system that de-stresses him completely.
• Let there be just one admission test for all professional programmes, more to test the ability of the test taker to go through the rigours of a professional programme.
• Assign a weightage to Class 12 marks/grades by all means. Make sure that the weightage assigned is high enough - say 75-85 percent so that the students don’t queue up at the cram schools, hereafter.
• Institutes like BITS, Pilani, have for decades used a method to create parity between students of two dozen-odd boards in the country.
• Use a “SAT”, “GRE” or “GMAT” kind of a computer-based test with a year-long test window with multiple attempts and a three-year-long score validity.
• Within this computer-based format align the test with the curriculum that is taught in most boards by the number of students. Do away with negative marking to let the students take calculated risks.
• Let the test takers appear for the test as per their convenience. Allow them to choose a test date that works best for them. Permit them to take re-tests if they feel they could not perform to the best of their abilities.
• Taking the re-test in the same year has another benefit - the student does not need to a year to try and get admission.

And let our future engineers be a product of a system that encourages innovation, creativity and openness,  not just cramming.