Defamation in Criminal Law - Overview, Structure, Properties & Uses

Defamation in Criminal Law

Edited By Ritika Jonwal | Updated on Jul 02, 2025 05:47 PM IST

Defamation is the act of disseminating false information about someone to damage that person's reputation in the eyes of the public. Any intentional, knowing, and purposeful statement that is false, improper, and meant to damage someone's reputation is considered defamation.. A person's reputation is regarded as his property, and any harm to it is illegal. It might be spoken or written. Libel refers to defamation that is written, printed, typed, or depicted in graphics; slander refers to defamation that is spoken. Defamation is covered under the Legal studies.

This Story also Contains

History of Defamation
Defamation Law in India
Essential Ingredients of Defamation
Types of Defamation
Exceptions for Defamation
Punishment for Defamation
Case Laws on Defamation
Conclusion

Defamation in Criminal Law

History of Defamation

The history of defamation can be found in both German and Roman law. In Roman law, abusive chants were punishable by death. In early English and German law, insults were punished by having the tongue cut out. In England, only accusations of crime, social disease, or casting doubt on one's professional ability constituted slander in the late 18th century. The Slander of Women Act made the imputation of unchastity illegal. French defamation laws were extremely harsh. In newspapers, it was highly penalized to retract libellous content. In Italy, defamation is criminally punishable and truth rarely serves as an excuse for defection.

Defamation Law in India

Several freedoms are granted to the citizens by Article 19 of the Indian Constitution. Nonetheless, the reasonable exemption to the freedom of speech and expression guaranteed by Article 19(1) (a) has been enforced by Article 19(2). Defamation, inciting an infraction, and contempt of court are a few examples of exclusions.

It is illegal to defame someone in both civil and criminal contexts. The Law of Torts in civil law punishes defamation by requiring the claimant to receive damages as compensation. Defamation is a non-cognizable, compoundable, and bailable offence under the criminal code. Therefore, a police officer can only arrest with a magistrate's arrest warrant. According to the Indian Penal Code, the offence carries a fine, a simple jail sentence of up to two years, or both.

Sections 499, 500, 501, and 502 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 contain the provisions governing the offence of defamation. The Indian Penal Code, 1860 was created in 1860 and regulated several criminal offences, including defamation.

Essential Ingredients of Defamation

Statement Must be Defamatory in Nature

The comment must be defamatory, or it must tend to damage the plaintiff's reputation, for it to qualify as a defamatory crime. The litmus test for whether or not a comment constitutes defamation will be based on the opinions of the most rational members of society. Furthermore, even if the speech incited feelings of anger, disdain, or dislike, it is not a defence that can be used against someone.

In the case of Ram Jethmalani v. Subramaniyam Swami

In this case, The court determined that Dr Swamy was responsible for defaming Mr Jethmalani by claiming that he had accepted funding from an illegal organization to defend the then-chief minister of Tamil Nadu in the Rajiv Gandhi assassination case.

Statement Must Refer to the Plaintiff

In a defamation lawsuit, the plaintiff must establish that the comment the defendant made about him was directed against him; it will not matter if the defendant had no intention of defaming the plaintiff. The defendant shall be held accountable if the person to whom the statement was published could reasonably assume that the comment was directed at him.

In the case of, T.V. Ramasubha Iyer v. A.M.A Mohindeen

In this case, the defendants were found accountable by the court for releasing a statement they did not intend to discredit. The announcement said that someone who was shipping Agarbathis products to Ceylon had been arrested for smuggling. The plaintiff, who ran a similar company, also experienced serious damage to his reputation as a result of this statement.

Such Statement Must be Published

Publishing a message that defames someone other than the intended recipient is the most important step in making someone answerable for defamation. A slander action cannot be brought without this. However, if a letter meant for the plaintiff is misunderstood by someone else, the defendant may still be held liable. However, if the plaintiff gets a letter that is likely to be seen by someone else that is defamatory, then publication will be legally published.

In the case of, Mahendra Ram v. Harnandan Prasad

In this case, The defendant was found accountable for sending the plaintiff a defamatory letter written in Urdu even though the defendant knew the plaintiff did not speak the language and that someone else would probably read the message.

You may also read

Types of Defamation

Libel

For an action to be classified as libel, the evidence in question must be proven to be false, defamatory, made public, or in writing. The allegedly defamatory statement must also be made concerning the plaintiff, either directly or indirectly, and must also establish a reasonable connection between the statement and the individual.

It is also not necessary to name the defendant, even when their intention is not to be stated explicitly. However, defamation cannot be directed towards a deceased person or a group of persons, such as doctors. As a result, if the live person's reputation is harmed by the defamation, they may be sued for defamation under these conditions.

Slander

In many cases, slander might also be quite similar to libel. When you shout insulting things at your clerk, and she types them on a letterhead, you are making a statement that you want a third party to hear. Therefore, in this case, the transmission method is considered transitory.

Exceptions for Defamation

First Exception- Attribution of Truth Made for Public Good

If an imputation is made or published for the advantage of the public, it is not considered defamation to suggest anything accurate about another person. Whether or not it is in the public interest, is a factual matter. The accused must prove that the statement he made was true in full, not just in part, to be eligible for this exception. An inquiry into whether the publication meant to provide any advantage to the whole or portion of the public is necessary to prove whether or not the statement was made for the public good.

Second Exception- Conduct of Public Servants

It is not defamatory to express in good faith any opinion concerning the behaviour of a public servant while carrying out his official duties or regarding his character, only to the extent that such behaviour reflects his character. As long as their remarks are not motivated by hatred, everyone has the freedom to express their opinions about the activities of public authorities that have an impact on them as citizens of the nation. For a comment to be considered fair-

It ought to be grounded in actual events.
It should not be assumed that the person whose behaviour or output is being criticized has corrupt or dishonest motivations unless the evidence supports such an assumption.
It must be a truthful and impartial assessment of the author's actual viewpoint.
There must be a common benefit.

Third Exception- Respecting the Conduct of Any Person Relating to Public Questions

It is not defamatory to voice opinions in good faith about the behaviour of any individual concerning any public matter, and to respect that person's character solely to the degree that that behaviour reveals it. Publicists who engage in politics or other issues impacting the public may face criticism despite their good intentions.

Fourth Exception- Publications of Reports of Procedures of Courts

It is not defamatory to publish a report that is truthful of the procedures of a Court of Justice or the outcome of any such proceedings. The publication of a fair and accurate account of proceedings before a properly formed judiciary panel in an open court setting is protected by the privilege against malicious publication.

Fifth Exception- Opinion on any Civil or Criminal Cases Decided by the Court

Forming an honest assessment of the merits of any civil or criminal case decided by a court of justice, or the behaviour of any individual involved in the case as a witness, agent, or party, or the nature of that individual, to the extent that it is evident in that behaviour, and no more is not considered defamation. Public discussion can be allowed regarding the court's ruling, the jury's conclusion, and the behaviour of the parties and witnesses. Critique, however, ought to be voiced fairly and in good faith.

Sixth Exception- Merits on Performance of Public

It is not defamatory to voice opinions in good faith about the merits of a performance that its creator has submitted for public review or about the creator's character as it is demonstrated in that performance and no more.

This exception is intended to let the general public evaluate the public performance that is the subject of the review. It is appropriate to express concerns over any type of public performance, provided that the criticism is given equitably and with good intentions. According to this exception, good faith requires reasonable care and attention rather than logical infallibility.

Seventh Exception- Censure Passed by a Person having Lawful Authority over Another in Good Faith

Whether that power is derived from a legal agreement or another source, it is not defamatory for someone in a position of authority to criticize another person's actions in good faith when it comes to matters of that lawful authority.

This exception permits the person whose authority others have been placed under either voluntarily or per the law to legitimately criticize others who have been placed under his supervision, so long as that authority is relevant to the matter at hand. On the other hand, abuse of this privilege will be considered a crime.

Eighth Exception- Accusition to an Authorised Person in Good Faith

Making a sincere accusation against someone to a person with authorized jurisdiction over them over the charge's subject matter is not considered defamation. Moreover, in a criminal defamation case, even statements made in a plant are not completely protected; to establish a defence under this exception, the accused must show that the person filing the complaint had legal authority over the individual facing charges under the specific facts.

Last Exception- Imputations to Protect His or Other’s Interest

It is not deemed defamatory to denigrate the character of another where the accusation is made with good intentions to safeguard one's interests, the interests of others, or the greater good. Because of this exception, the party to whom the information is revealed has a stake in keeping the accuser safe. Apart from the veracity of the imputation maker, there must be a shared interest between the recipient and the imputation maker for the communication to be valid.

While the first exemption only applies to sincere imputation for the benefit of the public, this exception covers any imputation undertaken in good faith. The defendant needs to demonstrate that he acted in good faith.

Punishment for Defamation

Section 500 IPC

Section 501 IPC

Section 501 of the Indian Penal Code forbids the publication of defamatory material. It says that anyone who prints or engraves something defamatory would harm that person's reputation and bring shame and embarrassment to their character, knowing or having reason to suspect that such a thing is defamatory. The maximum penalty allowed under this clause is two years in prison, a fine, or both.

Section 502 IPC

Section 502 of the Indian Penal Code penalizes anyone who sells or plans to sell any printed item that he knows or has reasonable suspicion contains defamatory material. There will be a two-year maximum sentence for imprisonment or a fine. Both are applicable in some situations.

Case Laws on Defamation

In the case of, B.R.K Murthy v. State of AP

In this case, The newspaper's editor made disparaging remarks that included falsehoods without giving them enough thought or making an effort to confirm them before publishing them, and she did not do so in a sincere effort to do so. The accused was declared guilty by the court because the charges made against him under Sections 500, 501, and 502 of the IPC and Section 34 of the IPC, 1860 were true.

In the case of, Shubhash K. Shah v. K Shankar Bhat

In this case, The petitioner is a Class I officer from a well-known business family. The respondent, a weekly editor, published a piece in his newspaper that contained false and defamatory charges about him. The editor did not apologize until after he was convinced. The punishment was then enhanced from a fine to a strict two-month jail sentence and a fine of Rs. 2,000.

Conclusion

The Constitution of India provides the Right to Speech and Expression under Article 19(1)(A) to the citizens of the country. The Right given by the Constitution of India to express freely comes with a set of reasonable restrictions, one of the restrictions happens to be defamation. This means publishing derogatory statements against a person which is not true and such statements harm the reputation of the person. Section 499 of the Indian Penal Code 1860 deals with the offence of defamation and section 500, 501 and 502 of the IPC provides the punishment for defamation.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What is Defamation Under IPC?

The definition of defamation is given in section 499 of the Indian Penal Code. It states that anyone who makes or publishes an imputation about another person with the intent to harm that person's reputation as long as they know or have reasonable suspicion that it will is considered to have defamed that person.

2. What are sections 499 and 500 of IPC?

A person found guilty of criminal defamation faces a two-year prison sentence under sections 499 and 500 of the IPC.

3. What is Simple Defamation?

Defamation is when someone writes or says something negative about another individual, damaging their reputation.

4. Give an example of Defamation.

Publishing a false report in a magazine alleging that a well-known celebrity has committed a crime is an example of defamation of character.

5. Is Defamation Bailable or Not?

Defamation is a Bailable and non-cognizable offence.

6. How does the concept of "public figure" affect criminal defamation cases?

Public figures, such as politicians or celebrities, face a higher bar in proving defamation. They must typically prove that the defamatory statement was made with "actual malice." This standard protects free speech and encourages public debate, making it more challenging for public figures to succeed in criminal defamation cases.

7. Can corporations be victims of criminal defamation?

In some jurisdictions, corporations can be victims of criminal defamation. However, this varies widely between legal systems. Some argue that only natural persons should be protected by criminal defamation laws, while others contend that protecting corporate reputations serves a valid public interest.

8. What is the role of "actual malice" in criminal defamation cases?

"Actual malice" is a key concept in defamation law, especially for public figures. It refers to the defendant's knowledge that the statement was false or their reckless disregard for its truth or falsity. In criminal defamation cases, proving actual malice is often necessary, particularly when the victim is a public figure.

9. What is the impact of the First Amendment on criminal defamation laws in the US?

The First Amendment significantly limits criminal defamation laws in the US. Many states have repealed or narrowed their criminal defamation statutes due to First Amendment concerns. Courts often scrutinize these laws closely to ensure they don't infringe on free speech rights, making criminal defamation prosecutions rare in the US.

10. What is the statute of limitations for criminal defamation?

The statute of limitations for criminal defamation varies by jurisdiction. It typically ranges from one to three years from the date of publication or utterance. Some jurisdictions may have longer periods for certain types of defamation or if the defamatory content is continuously accessible, as with online publications.

11. How does criminal defamation law apply to statements made in academic or scientific contexts?

Statements made in academic or scientific contexts often receive heightened protection due to the importance of academic freedom and scientific debate. Courts generally give more leeway to statements of opinion or interpretation of data in these contexts. However, knowingly false statements of fact could still potentially be subject to defamation charges.

12. What is the impact of anonymity on criminal defamation cases?

Anonymity can complicate criminal defamation cases. Prosecutors may face challenges in identifying the source of anonymous defamatory statements, particularly online. Some jurisdictions have developed procedures for unmasking anonymous speakers in defamation cases, balancing free speech rights with the need to address harmful speech.

13. How does criminal defamation law handle statements made in the heat of the moment?

Statements made in the heat of the moment, such as during an argument, may be treated differently in criminal defamation cases. Courts may consider the context and whether the speaker had time for reflection. However, this doesn't provide blanket protection; if the statement meets other criteria for defamation, it could still be actionable.

14. What is the role of public interest in criminal defamation cases?

Public interest can play a significant role in criminal defamation cases. Courts often balance the harm to an individual's reputation against the public's right to know about matters of public concern. Statements on issues of public interest may receive greater protection, particularly if they contribute to important public debates.

15. How does criminal defamation law apply to statements made in artistic works?

Artistic works, including fiction, poetry, and visual art, generally receive strong protection under free speech principles. Courts typically recognize artistic license and are reluctant to find defamation in fictional or artistic contexts. However, if an artistic work clearly refers to and defames a real person, it could potentially be subject to defamation law.

16. How does criminal defamation law apply to statements made in a foreign language?

When defamatory statements are made in a foreign language, courts typically consider how the statement would be understood by speakers of that language. Translation issues can complicate these cases. The court may need expert testimony to understand the nuances and potential multiple meanings of the statements in the original language.

17. What is the "single publication rule" in defamation law?

The single publication rule states that a defamatory statement gives rise to only one cause of action, which occurs at the time of first publication. This rule prevents multiple lawsuits for the same content, even if it's viewed by many people over time. It's particularly relevant for online publications and can affect how the statute of limitations is applied.

18. How does criminal defamation law handle hyperbole or exaggeration?

Courts generally recognize that hyperbole or exaggeration is not defamation. Statements that are clearly opinion or rhetorical hyperbole are protected speech. The key is whether a reasonable person would understand the statement as stating actual facts about the individual or merely expressing strong opinions.

19. What is "defamation by implication" and how is it treated in criminal law?

Defamation by implication occurs when a statement, while literally true, carries a defamatory meaning through implication. In criminal law, this concept can be complex to prove and prosecute. Courts must carefully balance protecting reputations with preserving free speech, often requiring clear evidence of the implied meaning and intent.

20. How does criminal defamation law handle statements made about public policy or government actions?

Statements about public policy or government actions generally receive strong protection under free speech principles. Criminal defamation charges for such statements are rare and heavily scrutinized. Courts typically require a high standard of proof that the statements were knowingly false and made with malicious intent to harm specific individuals rather than criticize policies.

21. Is truth an absolute defense against criminal defamation?

In most jurisdictions, truth is an absolute defense against criminal defamation charges. If the defendant can prove that their statement was substantially true, they cannot be held liable for defamation. However, some countries may still prosecute true statements if they were made with malicious intent.

22. Can opinions be considered defamatory in criminal law?

Generally, opinions are not considered defamatory in criminal law. Defamation typically requires a false statement of fact. However, if an opinion implies undisclosed defamatory facts, it may be considered defamatory. The distinction between fact and opinion can sometimes be complex and context-dependent.

23. Can satire or parody be considered criminal defamation?

Satire and parody are generally protected forms of speech and not considered criminal defamation. However, if a reasonable person could interpret the content as stating actual facts rather than as satire, it could potentially be defamatory. Courts often consider context and whether the content would be understood as satire by the average reader.

24. What is the "innocent construction rule" in defamation law?

The innocent construction rule states that if a statement can be reasonably interpreted in a non-defamatory way, it should be. This rule aims to protect free speech by giving the benefit of the doubt to potentially ambiguous statements. It's more commonly applied in civil cases but can be relevant in criminal defamation as well.

25. How does criminal defamation law handle statements about deceased individuals?

Most jurisdictions do not recognize defamation of deceased individuals in criminal law. The rationale is that a deceased person's reputation can't be damaged, and they can't suffer harm. However, some jurisdictions may have specific laws protecting the memory of the deceased or allowing family members to bring actions in certain circumstances.

26. What is the impact of cultural context on criminal defamation cases?

Cultural context can significantly impact criminal defamation cases. What's considered defamatory in one culture might not be in another. Courts may need to consider cultural norms and sensitivities when evaluating potentially defamatory statements, particularly in diverse societies or in cases involving cross-cultural communication.

27. How does criminal defamation law apply to statements made in political campaigns?

Statements made during political campaigns receive strong protection due to the importance of political speech in a democracy. Courts set a very high bar for finding criminal defamation in political contexts. However, knowingly false statements of fact made with malicious intent could still potentially be subject to defamation law, even in political contexts.

28. What is "group defamation" and how is it treated in criminal law?

Group defamation refers to defamatory statements made about a group or class of people. In criminal law, group defamation is often treated differently from individual defamation. Many jurisdictions require the defamatory statement to be clearly applicable to all members of a relatively small group for it to be actionable.

29. What is the "wire service defense" in defamation law?

The wire service defense protects news organizations that republish information from reputable news sources without independent verification. While more commonly used in civil cases, it can be relevant in criminal defamation if charges are brought against media outlets. It emphasizes the importance of relying on credible sources in journalism.

30. What is the "incremental harm doctrine" in defamation law?

The incremental harm doctrine states that if a publication contains both defamatory and non-defamatory statements about the plaintiff, and the non-defamatory statements are more damaging, the defamatory statements are not actionable. While more common in civil cases, this concept can be relevant in assessing the overall harm in criminal defamation cases.

31. What is the role of damages in criminal defamation cases?

Unlike civil defamation, criminal defamation doesn't typically involve awarding damages to the victim. Instead, penalties usually involve fines paid to the state or imprisonment. However, some jurisdictions may allow for victim compensation as part of sentencing, particularly if the defamation resulted in quantifiable economic harm.

32. What is the impact of retractions or apologies on criminal defamation cases?

Retractions or apologies can sometimes mitigate the severity of criminal defamation charges or influence sentencing. Some jurisdictions have specific laws about retractions, potentially reducing damages or serving as evidence of lack of malice. However, they don't necessarily prevent prosecution or conviction.

33. How does criminal defamation law apply to statements made in confidential settings?

Statements made in confidential settings, such as private conversations or confidential reports, can still be considered defamatory. However, the private nature of the communication might affect how the case is prosecuted or defended. Issues of privacy rights and expectation of confidentiality may come into play.

34. How does criminal defamation law handle republication of defamatory statements?

Republication of defamatory statements can be treated as a new instance of defamation in many jurisdictions. This means that each time a defamatory statement is repeated or shared, it could potentially give rise to a new cause of action. This concept is particularly relevant in the age of social media and online communication.

35. How does criminal defamation law apply to social media posts?

Criminal defamation law applies to social media posts similarly to other forms of communication. However, the global nature of social media can complicate jurisdictional issues. Factors like the poster's location, the victim's location, and where the harm occurred can all play a role in determining jurisdiction and applicable laws.

36. How does criminal defamation differ from civil defamation?

Criminal defamation is prosecuted by the state as a crime, potentially resulting in fines or imprisonment. Civil defamation is a private lawsuit where the injured party seeks damages. Criminal defamation often requires proof of malicious intent, while civil cases focus more on the falsity of the statement and resulting harm.

37. What are the two main types of defamation?

The two main types of defamation are libel and slander. Libel refers to written or published defamatory statements, including online posts. Slander involves spoken defamatory statements or gestures. Both can be grounds for criminal defamation in jurisdictions where it's recognized.

38. What is the difference between per se and per quod defamation?

Defamation per se refers to statements that are inherently defamatory and presumed to cause damage, such as accusations of criminal activity or professional incompetence. Defamation per quod requires the plaintiff to prove special damages. In criminal cases, this distinction may affect the severity of charges or sentencing.

39. What is defamation in criminal law?

Defamation in criminal law refers to the act of damaging someone's reputation through false statements. It involves communicating false information about a person that harms their character, fame, or reputation in the community. Criminal defamation is considered a crime in some jurisdictions, unlike civil defamation which is a tort.

40. What is the role of intent in criminal defamation cases?

Intent plays a crucial role in criminal defamation cases. Most jurisdictions require proof that the defendant intended to harm the victim's reputation or acted with reckless disregard for the truth. This distinguishes criminal defamation from civil defamation, where intent may be less critical.

41. How does the concept of "qualified privilege" apply in criminal defamation cases?

Qualified privilege is a defense that protects certain communications made in good faith and without malice, even if they turn out to be false. In criminal defamation, this might apply to statements made in official reports, judicial proceedings, or in the performance of a legal or moral duty. The privilege can be lost if the statement is made with malice.

42. How does criminal defamation law handle statements made under duress or coercion?

Statements made under duress or coercion may be treated differently in criminal defamation cases. If a defendant can prove they were forced to make the defamatory statement against their will, this could serve as a defense. However, the level of duress required and how it's evaluated can vary by jurisdiction.

43. What is the "fair report privilege" and how does it apply in criminal defamation?

The fair report privilege protects accurate reports of official proceedings or public meetings from defamation claims. In criminal defamation, this privilege can be a defense for journalists or others who accurately report on government proceedings, even if those proceedings contain defamatory statements about individuals.

44. What is the "neutral reportage privilege" and how does it relate to criminal defamation?

The neutral reportage privilege protects the media when accurately and objectively reporting serious charges against public figures, even if those charges turn out to be false. While more commonly applied in civil cases, this concept can be relevant in criminal defamation cases involving media reporting on public controversies.

45. How does criminal defamation law handle statements made in professional reviews or critiques?

Professional reviews or critiques, such as restaurant reviews or product evaluations, are generally protected as opinion. However, if they include false statements of fact (rather than opinions) that harm reputation, they could potentially be subject to defamation law. Courts typically give wide latitude to professional critiques, recognizing their value to consumers and the marketplace of ideas.

46. What is the impact of retweeting or sharing defamatory content on social media in criminal defamation cases?

Retweeting or sharing defamatory content can potentially expose individuals to criminal defamation charges in some jurisdictions. The act of sharing might be seen as republication of the defamatory statement. However, courts may consider factors such as whether the person added their own commentary, the context of the sharing, and whether they knew or should have known the content was defamatory.

47. What is the "substantial truth" doctrine in defamation law?

The substantial truth doctrine holds that a statement doesn't have to be 100% accurate to be protected from defamation claims. If the "gist" or "sting" of the statement is true, minor inaccuracies won't necessarily make it defamatory. This doctrine recognizes that perfect accuracy is often impossible and protects good-faith efforts at truthful reporting.

48. How does criminal defamation law handle statements made in emergency situations?

Statements made in emergency situations may be treated differently due to the urgency and potential public safety concerns. Courts may consider the context and whether the speaker reasonably believed the information was true and necessary to communicate. However, knowingly false statements that cause harm could still potentially be subject to defamation charges.

49. How does criminal defamation law apply to statements made in historical accounts or biographies?

Historical accounts and biographies generally receive strong protection due to their educational and cultural value. Courts typically give authors latitude in interpreting historical events or personal histories. However, knowingly false statements of fact that defame individuals could still potentially be subject to defamation law, even in historical works.

50. What is the role of expert testimony in criminal defamation cases?

Expert testimony can play a crucial role in criminal defamation cases. Experts might be called to testify about the meaning of specialized terms, the standards of a particular profession, or the likely impact of a statement on a person's reputation. In cases involving complex or technical subject matter, expert testimony can help the court understand the context and implications of the allegedly defamatory statements.

51. How does criminal defamation law handle statements made in the context of whistleblowing?

Whistleblowing often receives special protection due to its importance in exposing wrongdoing. Many jurisdictions have specific laws protecting whistleblowers from retaliation, including defamation charges. However, if a purported whistleblower knowingly makes false statements with malicious intent, they could potentially still face defamation charges.

52. What is the impact of a person's prior reputation on criminal defamation cases?

A person's prior reputation