Download Careers360 App
Graph Between Applied Force And The Force Of Friction

Graph Between Applied Force And The Force Of Friction

Edited By Vishal kumar | Updated on Jul 02, 2025 07:40 PM IST

When studying the interaction between objects, the relationship between applied force and the force of friction is fundamental. Friction is the resistive force that opposes the motion of an object when it moves across a surface. The graph between the applied force and the force of friction reveals how friction responds as more force is applied, often showing initial static friction that must be overcome before the object begins to move. In real life, this concept is evident when pushing a heavy piece of furniture across a floor. Initially, a greater force is required to overcome static friction and get the object moving, but once in motion, the force needed to keep it moving (overcoming kinetic friction) is generally less. Understanding this relationship is crucial not only in physics but also in everyday activities such as driving, where friction between the tyres and the road determines how effectively a car can accelerate or stop.

This Story also Contains
  1. Graph Between Applied Force and the Force of Friction
  2. Solved Examples Based on Graph Between Applied Force and the Force of Friction
  3. Summary

Graph Between Applied Force and the Force of Friction

The relationship between applied force and the force of friction is a key concept in understanding how objects interact with surfaces. Friction is the force that resists the motion of one surface over another, and it plays a crucial role in our daily lives. For instance, when you push a heavy object, like a sofa, across a room, you experience the force of friction firsthand. Initially, you need to apply a significant amount of force to overcome static friction and get the object moving. Once the object is in motion, the force required to keep it moving—overcoming kinetic friction—tends to be lower. The graph depicting this relationship typically shows a rise in friction up to the point where the object starts to move, after which the friction force stabilizes.

At A static friction is the maximum

OA = Represents static friction

Beyond A, the force of friction decreases slightly

2.

The angle between the normal reaction and resultant contact force is called the angle of friction $(\theta)$.

$\begin{aligned} & \tan \theta=\frac{F_l}{R} \\ & \tan \theta=\mu_s \\ & \frac{F_l}{R}=\mu_s \\ & \mathrm{R}=\text { Reaction, } \\ & F_l=\text { Force of limiting friction } \\ & \theta=\tan ^{-1}\left(\mu_s\right)\end{aligned}$

3.


$
\begin{aligned}
& S=\sqrt{F^2+R^2} \\
& S=\sqrt{(\mu m g)^2+(m g)^2} \\
& S=m g \sqrt{\mu^2+1} \\
& \mathrm{~S}=\text { Resultant force } \\
& \mu=\text { Coefficient of friction }
\end{aligned}
$
If $\mu=0, \mathrm{~S}$ (will be minimum), $\therefore \mathrm{S}=\mathrm{mg}$

Recommended Topic Video

Solved Examples Based on Graph Between Applied Force and the Force of Friction

Example 1: Mark the correct statement about friction between two bodies

a) static friction is always greater than kinetic friction

b) The coefficient of static friction is always greater than the coefficient of kinetic friction

c) limiting friction is always greater than kinetic friction

d) limiting friction is never less than static friction

1) b,c,d

2) a,b,c

3) a,c,d

4) a,b,d

Solution:

The graph between Applied Force and Force of Friction

wherein

At A static friction is maximum.

OA = Represents static friction

* Beyond A force of friction decreases slightly

Hence, the answer is the option (1).

Example 2: A force of 100N is just sufficient to pull a block of mass $10 \sqrt{3}$ kg on a rough horizontal surface. What is angle friction? (g=10m/s2)

1) $30^{\circ}$
2) $45^{\circ}$
3) $60^{\circ}$
4) $50^{\circ}$

Solution:

Given

Applied force, $F=100 \mathrm{~N}$
Mass of the block, $m=100 \sqrt{3} \mathrm{~kg}$

As the Force F is just sufficient to pull the block, it must be equal to the limiting friction force.

F.B.D of the block-


$
\begin{aligned}
& N=m g \\
& f_l=F
\end{aligned}
$
Angle of friction $(\theta)$ is defined as-

$
\begin{aligned}
& \tan \theta=\frac{f_l}{N} \\
& \theta=\tan ^{-1} \frac{F}{N}=\frac{100}{100 \sqrt{3}} \\
& \Rightarrow \theta=30^{\circ}
\end{aligned}
$

Hence, the answer is the option (1).

Example 3: A block is placed on a rough horizontal plane. A time-dependent horizontal force $F=k t$ acts on the bock, where k is a positive constant. The acceleration - time graph of the block is :

1)


2)


3)


4)


Solution:

As the block is placed on a rough surface there will act static friction on it will attain its maximum value. After that, the block will start to slide on the surface with acceleration increasing with time.

1) the equation for the block when it is static $\left(\right.$ i.e $\left.t \leq \frac{\mu m g}{k}\right)$

$
\begin{aligned}
& k t=f s \\
& a=0
\end{aligned}
$

2) After it starts sliding $\left(\right.$ i.e $\left.\quad t>\frac{\mu m g}{k}\right)$

$
\begin{aligned}
& k t-\mu m g=a \\
& \frac{d a}{d t}=k
\end{aligned}
$

Hence, the answer is the option (2).

Example 4: Which of the following options correctly describes the variation of the speed v and acceleration ‘a’ of a point mass falling vertically in a viscous medium that applies a force F =−kv, where ‘k’ is a constant, on the body? (Graphs are schematic and not drawn to scale)

1)

2)

3)

4)

Solution:

When the pt. mass will start falling its initial velocity will be O & have maximum acceleration. After the mass has a steady state velocity a = 0 the variation is exponential.

Hence, the answer is the option (2).

Summary

The relationship between applied force and friction is crucial in understanding how objects interact with surfaces. Initially, a significant force is required to overcome static friction and get an object moving, after which the force of friction decreases slightly as it transitions to kinetic friction. This concept is reflected in real-life scenarios like pushing furniture, where the graph shows a peak in friction before movement begins. Understanding this relationship helps in analyzing forces in various practical situations, such as determining the angle of friction or calculating the force needed to move objects on rough surfaces.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What is the relationship between applied force and friction force on a graph?
The graph between applied force and friction force typically shows a linear relationship up to a certain point, then plateaus. Initially, as applied force increases, friction force increases proportionally. This is static friction. Once the object starts moving, the friction force remains constant (kinetic friction) regardless of further increases in applied force.
2. Why does the friction force remain constant after a certain point on the graph?
The friction force remains constant after a certain point because this represents the transition from static to kinetic friction. Once the object starts moving, the kinetic friction force is generally less than the maximum static friction and remains constant regardless of the applied force, as it depends on the normal force and the coefficient of kinetic friction.
3. How does the slope of the graph change between static and kinetic friction regions?
In the static friction region, the graph has a positive slope, showing that friction force increases with applied force. When kinetic friction takes over, the slope becomes zero, forming a horizontal line. This change in slope represents the transition from static to kinetic friction.
4. What does the y-intercept of the graph represent?
The y-intercept of the graph represents the minimum force of friction present when no external force is applied. In most cases, this should be zero, as friction only opposes motion or impending motion.
5. What does the area under the curve represent in this graph?
The area under the curve in this graph represents the work done against friction. In the static friction region, it represents the work done in deforming surfaces before motion begins. In the kinetic friction region, it represents the energy dissipated as heat due to friction during motion.
6. How can you determine the coefficient of static friction from the graph?
The coefficient of static friction can be determined from the graph by finding the point where the friction force reaches its maximum value just before the object starts moving. This maximum static friction force divided by the normal force gives the coefficient of static friction.
7. How would the graph look for a frictionless surface?
For a frictionless surface, the graph would be a horizontal line at zero on the y-axis (friction force). This means that regardless of the applied force, there would be no friction force opposing the motion.
8. How can you use this graph to explain why it's harder to start pushing a heavy object than to keep it moving?
The graph shows that the maximum static friction (the peak before the plateau) is higher than the kinetic friction (the plateau). This illustrates why it's harder to start pushing a heavy object (overcoming static friction) than to keep it moving (overcoming kinetic friction).
9. What does the maximum point on the graph represent?
The maximum point on the graph represents the maximum static friction force. This is the point just before the object starts moving, where static friction is at its highest. After this point, kinetic friction takes over, which is typically less than the maximum static friction.
10. Why is there sometimes a small "dip" in the graph when transitioning from static to kinetic friction?
The small "dip" in the graph when transitioning from static to kinetic friction represents the fact that kinetic friction is typically slightly less than the maximum static friction. This occurs because once an object starts moving, it's easier to keep it in motion than it was to start the motion initially.
11. How does the graph change if the surface becomes more rough?
If the surface becomes more rough, the graph will show a steeper initial slope in the static friction region and a higher plateau in the kinetic friction region. This is because rougher surfaces generally have higher coefficients of both static and kinetic friction.
12. How does the normal force affect the graph?
The normal force affects the overall magnitude of the friction forces. A larger normal force will result in higher friction forces, shifting the entire graph upwards. This is because both static and kinetic friction forces are proportional to the normal force.
13. Can the friction force ever be greater than the applied force on this graph?
No, the friction force cannot be greater than the applied force on this graph. The friction force opposes the applied force and can at most equal it. If the friction force were greater, it would cause motion in the opposite direction, which contradicts the definition of friction as a resistive force.
14. How would the graph change if the object's mass increases?
If the object's mass increases, the normal force also increases (assuming the object is on a horizontal surface). This would result in higher friction forces overall, shifting the entire graph upwards. The shape of the graph would remain similar, but with higher values for both static and kinetic friction.
15. What does a steeper initial slope in the graph indicate?
A steeper initial slope in the graph indicates a higher coefficient of static friction. This means that the friction force increases more rapidly with applied force before the object starts moving, suggesting a "stickier" or rougher surface.
16. What would cause the kinetic friction portion of the graph to have a slight positive slope instead of being perfectly horizontal?
A slight positive slope in the kinetic friction portion could be due to factors like surface deformation, heat generation, or changes in the contact area as the applied force increases. In real-world scenarios, the coefficient of kinetic friction isn't always perfectly constant.
17. How does this graph relate to the concept of limiting friction?
Limiting friction is represented by the peak of the graph, just before it plateaus. This is the maximum static friction force, beyond which the object will start moving. It's called "limiting" because it's the limit of how much friction force can oppose motion before sliding occurs.
18. Can you explain why the graph doesn't start exactly at the origin (0,0)?
In some real-world scenarios, the graph might not start exactly at the origin due to factors like surface adhesion or small-scale bonding between surfaces. This initial resistance, even with no applied force, could cause a small positive y-intercept.
19. How would the graph look different for rolling friction compared to sliding friction?
For rolling friction, the graph would generally show lower friction forces overall compared to sliding friction. The transition from static to kinetic friction would be less pronounced, and the kinetic friction portion might have a slight positive slope due to factors like deformation of the rolling surface.
20. What does the x-intercept of this graph represent, if there is one?
There typically isn't an x-intercept in this graph, as friction force is always opposing motion or impending motion. If an x-intercept did exist, it would represent an applied force that results in zero friction, which is not physically realistic in most scenarios.
21. How does this graph help explain the concept of "break-away force"?
The "break-away force" is represented by the peak of the graph, where static friction is at its maximum. It's the force required to overcome static friction and initiate motion. After this point, the graph plateaus, showing the transition to kinetic friction.
22. Why is understanding this graph important for designing brake systems?
Understanding this graph is crucial for brake system design because it illustrates the difference between static and kinetic friction. Effective brakes need to maximize static friction to prevent motion and manage the transition to kinetic friction to control stopping distance and prevent skidding.
23. How would the graph change if the object was on an inclined plane instead of a horizontal surface?
On an inclined plane, the graph would shift to the left because some of the object's weight contributes to the force trying to move it down the plane. The overall shape would be similar, but the static friction region would be shorter, and kinetic friction would begin at a lower applied force.
24. Can you use this graph to explain why it's dangerous to slam on brakes while driving?
Yes, the graph shows that kinetic friction (when the wheels are sliding) is less than maximum static friction (when the wheels are rolling without slipping). Slamming on brakes can cause wheels to lock and slide, transitioning to the lower kinetic friction region, which results in less stopping power and loss of steering control.
25. How does this graph relate to the concept of "stick-slip" motion?
"Stick-slip" motion is represented by oscillations between the static and kinetic friction regions of the graph. The object "sticks" in the static region, then "slips" when it transitions to kinetic friction, then "sticks" again as it slows down, creating a repetitive pattern.
26. What would cause the transition point between static and kinetic friction to be less sharp or more gradual?
A less sharp transition could be due to factors like surface irregularities, gradual breaking of microscopic bonds between surfaces, or non-uniform pressure distribution. This would result in a more curved peak rather than a sharp point in the graph.
27. How does this graph help explain why it's easier to keep an object in motion than to start its motion?
The graph shows that the maximum static friction (the peak) is higher than kinetic friction (the plateau). This illustrates why it's easier to keep an object in motion (only needing to overcome kinetic friction) than to start its motion (needing to overcome the higher static friction).
28. Can you use this graph to explain the concept of "pre-sliding displacement"?
Pre-sliding displacement is represented by the initial, nearly linear portion of the graph before the peak. It shows small movements or deformations that occur before full sliding begins, where the friction force is proportional to the applied force.
29. How would the graph change if there was adhesion between the surfaces?
If there was adhesion between the surfaces, the graph would likely show a higher initial friction force (a positive y-intercept) and a steeper slope in the static friction region. The peak static friction would be higher, and there might be a more pronounced drop when transitioning to kinetic friction.
30. What does the difference between the peak and the plateau on the graph represent?
The difference between the peak and the plateau represents the difference between the maximum static friction and kinetic friction. This difference explains phenomena like stick-slip motion and why it's harder to start moving an object than to keep it moving.
31. How would the graph change if the surfaces were lubricated?
Lubrication would generally lower both static and kinetic friction. On the graph, this would be seen as a less steep initial slope, a lower peak (lower maximum static friction), and a lower plateau (lower kinetic friction). The transition from static to kinetic friction might also be smoother.
32. Can you explain how this graph relates to the concept of "friction lag"?
Friction lag, where friction force doesn't immediately adjust to changes in velocity, can be seen in the transition region of the graph. Instead of an instantaneous drop from maximum static friction to kinetic friction, there might be a more gradual transition, representing the time it takes for friction to adjust.
33. How does this graph help in understanding the phenomenon of "negative friction"?
While "negative friction" isn't typically shown on this standard graph, understanding the graph helps explain why the concept is counterintuitive. Friction typically opposes motion, so a "negative" friction (assisting motion) would be represented below the x-axis, which isn't part of the normal friction model.
34. What would cause the kinetic friction portion of the graph to have a negative slope?
A negative slope in the kinetic friction portion could occur in special cases where friction decreases with increasing velocity. This might happen due to factors like thermal effects, changes in surface properties, or in certain fluid dynamics scenarios, but it's not typical for solid-on-solid friction.
35. How does this graph relate to the concept of "Coulomb friction"?
This graph is a perfect representation of Coulomb friction model. The linear increase in the static region followed by a constant kinetic friction is exactly what Coulomb's law of friction predicts. The sharp transition point is an idealization in this model.
36. Can you use this graph to explain why static friction coefficients are typically larger than kinetic friction coefficients?
Yes, the graph clearly shows that the peak (representing maximum static friction) is higher than the plateau (representing kinetic friction). This visual representation directly illustrates that static friction coefficients are typically larger than kinetic friction coefficients.
37. How would the graph change for a system exhibiting "viscous friction" instead of dry friction?
For viscous friction, the graph would look quite different. Instead of a peak followed by a plateau, it would show a continuous increase in friction force with applied force (and thus velocity). The relationship might be linear or non-linear depending on the specific viscous system.
38. What does the instantaneous slope at any point on the graph represent?
The instantaneous slope at any point on the graph represents the rate of change of friction force with respect to applied force. In the static region, it's related to the coefficient of static friction. In the kinetic region, the slope is ideally zero, representing a constant coefficient of kinetic friction.
39. How can this graph be used to explain the concept of "static indeterminacy" in friction problems?
Static indeterminacy is represented by the vertical line segment from zero up to the maximum static friction force. For any applied force less than the maximum static friction, the friction force exactly matches it, creating a range of possible friction forces for a given situation, hence the indeterminacy.
40. Can you use this graph to explain why friction is sometimes described as a "non-conservative force"?
The graph helps illustrate why friction is non-conservative. The work done by friction (area under the curve) depends on the path taken, not just the start and end points. The energy lost to friction during motion (kinetic friction region) is not recoverable, unlike with conservative forces.
41. How would the graph change if the contact area between the surfaces increased?
Interestingly, for dry friction between solid surfaces, the graph wouldn't change significantly if only the contact area increased. According to Amontons' laws of friction, friction is independent of apparent contact area. However, in real-world scenarios, a larger area might lead to slight changes due to surface irregularities.
42. What does the discontinuity (if any) in the slope of the graph represent?
The discontinuity in the slope of the graph, typically seen at the transition from static to kinetic friction, represents the sudden change in the nature of the friction force. It marks the point where the object transitions from being stationary to being in motion.
43. How can this graph be used to explain the concept of "friction circle" in vehicle dynamics?
While the friction circle isn't directly shown on this graph, understanding the relationship between applied force and friction is crucial for the concept. The friction circle represents the maximum friction force available in any direction, which is analogous to the peak of this graph but in two dimensions.
44. Can you use this graph to explain why it's generally safer to pump brakes than to hold them constantly during emergency stops?
The graph shows that static friction (peak) is higher than kinetic friction (plateau). Pumping brakes allows the wheels to repeatedly reach the higher static friction region, providing more stopping power. Constant pressure might cause the wheels to lock, keeping them in the lower kinetic friction region.
45. How would the graph change if the experiment was conducted in a vacuum?
In a vacuum, the graph would likely remain largely the same for solid-on-solid contact. Friction in this case is primarily due to surface interactions, not air resistance. However, the absence of air might lead to slightly different surface conditions (e.g., no moisture), potentially affecting the friction coefficients slightly.
46. What would cause the graph to show multiple peaks before reaching the kinetic friction region?
Multiple peaks could occur in systems with complex surface interactions or multiple stages of breaking contact. This might be seen in materials with layered structures, where different layers break free at different applied forces, or in systems with multiple points of contact that break sequentially.
47. How can this graph be used to explain the difference between "gross slip" and "micro slip"?
The graph primarily shows "gross slip" in the kinetic friction region. "Micro slip" would be represented in the early part of the static friction region, where small, localized movements occur before the onset of gross slip. This is part of the pre-sliding displacement phenomenon.
48. Can you use this graph to explain why friction can sometimes cause vibrations or oscillations in mechanical systems?
The difference between static and kinetic friction shown in the graph can lead to oscillations. As an object starts to move (transitioning to the lower kinetic friction), it may slow down enough to stop (returning to static friction). This cycle can repeat, causing vibrations or stick-slip oscillations.
49. How would the graph change if the experiment was conducted at a much higher temperature?
At much higher temperatures, the graph might show lower overall friction forces due to changes in material properties. The transition from static to kinetic friction might become less distinct, and the kinetic friction region might show a slight slope due to temperature-dependent effects on the surfaces.
50. Can you use this graph to explain why some surfaces feel "sticky" even though they're not adhesive?
Surfaces that feel "sticky" often have a high static friction coefficient, represented by a steep initial slope and a high peak on the graph. This means it takes a significant force to initiate motion, creating the sensation of stickiness, even without actual adhesion. The transition to lower kinetic friction explains why the surface feels less sticky once motion starts.

Articles

Back to top