Hypothesis - Definition, Characteristics, Sources, Types, Examples, Functions, FAQs

Hypothesis - Definition, Characteristics, Sources, Types, Examples, Functions, FAQs

Team Careers360Updated on 02 Jul 2025, 04:30 PM IST

Suppose you see that the plants are greener near the window than the plants kept in the corner of a room. As a result of this observation you will be left with more questions such as: Does the plant need the sun? Such questions lead to the theory of Hypothesis. A hypothesis is a statement that describes a relationship between variables, such as sunlight (cause) and plant growth (effect). This article defines the theory of hypothesis with examples that make it easier to understand.

This Story also Contains

  1. Characteristics of Good Hypothesis
  2. Sources of Hypothesis
  3. Types of Hypothesis
  4. Functions of hypothesis
  5. Hypothesis Examples
Hypothesis - Definition, Characteristics, Sources, Types, Examples, Functions, FAQs
Hypothesis

What is a Hypothesis?

Hypothesis is the starting of any investigation. It explains what is going to happen further and how the investigation will go through. It consists of variables, a population, and the relationship between the variables. A hypothesis in research is a theory used to test the relationship between two or more variables.

Characteristics of Good Hypothesis

A Hypothesis should have the following characteristics in order to be complete:

  1. It must come into direct contact with observable objects. It should not be based on fake belief, but rather on observation.
  2. A Hypothesis should be understandable to everyone including laymen. It should not contain scientific terms or definitions which are complex and difficult for anyone.
  3. A Hypothesis has to be specific and to the point. It should not roam around the topic or contain extra irrelevant information.
  4. It should also be able to provide new ideas and suggestions for the investigation.

Also read -

NEET Highest Scoring Chapters & Topics
This ebook serves as a valuable study guide for NEET exams, specifically designed to assist students in light of recent changes and the removal of certain topics from the NEET exam.
Download E-book

Sources of Hypothesis

There are several sources of hypothesis but some of the important ones are given as follows :

  1. Previous study: Previous knowledge and information regarding the topic of the hypothesis will be extremely helpful in creating a concrete hypothesis.
  2. Personal experience: If one has a personal experience regarding the topic of investigation, he/she can use that information in the hypothesis to make it more complete and good quality.
  3. Thinking and imagination: A researcher's creative thinking and imagination can sometimes aid in the formulation of a good hypothesis. A researcher's personal ideas and thinking abilities would result in a greater number of hypothesis formulations as well as control over the problem.
  4. Scientific theory: It would be extremely helpful to use scientific theories in hypothesis because it is capable of explaining all the facts related to the investigation.

Commonly Asked Questions

Q: What role do anomalies play in the development of new hypotheses in physics?
A:
Anomalies, or observations that contradict existing theories or expectations, often lead to the development of new hypotheses in physics. They highlight gaps in our understanding and prompt physicists to formulate new explanations that can account for both the anomalous observations and previously established knowledge.
Q: How do physicists use thought experiments in developing hypotheses?
A:
Physicists use thought experiments as mental tools to explore hypothetical scenarios and their logical consequences. These imaginary experiments help in developing hypotheses by allowing physicists to consider extreme or idealized situations that may be impossible to create in reality, leading to new insights and predictions.
Q: What is the role of creativity in formulating physics hypotheses?
A:
Creativity plays a vital role in formulating physics hypotheses by allowing scientists to think beyond established paradigms and imagine new possibilities. Creative thinking helps physicists connect seemingly unrelated concepts, propose novel explanations, and design innovative experiments to test their ideas.
Q: How do physicists use the concept of symmetry in formulating hypotheses?
A:
Symmetry is a powerful concept in physics that often guides hypothesis formulation. Physicists look for underlying symmetries in nature, which can suggest conservation laws and fundamental principles. Hypotheses that respect known symmetries or propose new ones have historically led to significant advances in understanding the fundamental laws of the universe.
Q: How do physicists use dimensional analysis in developing hypotheses?
A:
Dimensional analysis is a powerful tool in developing physics hypotheses. It helps physicists ensure that their proposed relationships between physical quantities are dimensionally consistent, which is a necessary (though not sufficient) condition for a valid hypothesis. It can also guide the formulation of equations by revealing how different quantities must be combined.

Types of Hypothesis

There are basically several types of Hypothesis but some of the common and important types of formulation of Hypothesis are explained below:

  1. Simple hypothesis: It is also known as a basic hypothesis. It depicts the relationship between two variables, one of which is known as the independent variable or ‘cause' and the other as the dependent variable or ‘effect.'
  1. Complex hypothesis: A complex hypothesis is one that has multiple dependent and independent variables.
  1. Null hypothesis: It contradicts the empirical hypothesis because it asserts that there is no relationship between the dependent and independent variables. It basically says that the data and variables being tested do not exist.
  1. Alternative hypothesis: It is also referred to as a sustained hypothesis or a research hypothesis. To begin, numerous hypotheses are proposed. The most efficient one is then chosen from among them. Alternative hypotheses are further classified into four main types
  1. Point alternative hypothesis
  2. Non-directional alternative hypothesis
  3. One-tailed directional hypothesis
  4. Two-tailed directional hypothesis
  1. Logical hypothesis: It is logically verified, as the name implies. The verification process entails the following steps:
  • Agreement
  • Disagreement
  • Different points of view
  1. Empirical hypothesis: It is also known as a 'working hypothesis.' During the formulation phase, it is only an assumption, but once tested, it is no longer just an idea or notion. It is actually changing in relation to those independent variables.
  1. Statistical hypothesis: The statement could be logical or illogical, but if statistical evidence validates it, it becomes a statistical hypothesis.

Commonly Asked Questions

Q: What is the difference between a null hypothesis and an alternative hypothesis in physics?
A:
A null hypothesis in physics typically states that there is no significant effect or relationship between variables, while an alternative hypothesis proposes that there is a significant effect or relationship. The null hypothesis is what researchers try to disprove to support their alternative hypothesis.
Q: What is the difference between a working hypothesis and a scientific hypothesis in physics?
A:
A working hypothesis in physics is a tentative, practical assumption made to guide research or experimentation, even if not all aspects are fully developed or tested. A scientific hypothesis, on the other hand, is a more formal, well-developed proposition that makes specific, testable predictions based on existing knowledge and is intended to be rigorously evaluated.
Q: What is the significance of ad hoc hypotheses in physics, and why are they often viewed skeptically?
A:
Ad hoc hypotheses in physics are propositions introduced solely to explain a specific observation or save a theory from falsification, without independent justification. While sometimes necessary as placeholders, they are viewed skeptically because they lack predictive power beyond the specific case they were designed to explain and can hinder the development of more comprehensive theories.
Q: How do physicists balance the need for novel hypotheses with the principle of conservation of established theories?
A:
Physicists balance novelty and conservation by adhering to the principle of correspondence, which states that new theories should reduce to established ones in the domains where the old theories are well-tested. Novel hypotheses are encouraged, but they must explain not only new phenomena but also account for the successes of existing theories in their respective domains of validity.
Q: How do physicists use the concept of universality in formulating hypotheses?
A:
The concept of universality in physics suggests that certain phenomena exhibit similar behavior across different systems or scales. Physicists use this idea to formulate hypotheses that apply broadly, looking for underlying principles that govern diverse phenomena. This approach has led to powerful theories that unify seemingly disparate areas of physics.

Functions of hypothesis

There are several functions of hypothesis. Some of them are given below:

  • Hypothesis facilitates observation and experimentation.
  • It serves as the investigation’s starting point.
  • The hypothesis aids in the verification of the observations.
  • It aids in steering inquiries in the right direction.

Commonly Asked Questions

Q: How does a hypothesis differ from a scientific theory?
A:
A hypothesis is a tentative explanation or prediction that needs to be tested, while a scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of a natural phenomenon supported by a large body of evidence and repeated testing. Theories are more comprehensive and have withstood numerous attempts at falsification.
Q: Why is formulating hypotheses important in physics research?
A:
Formulating hypotheses is crucial in physics research because it provides a focused direction for investigation, helps design experiments, and allows for the systematic testing of ideas. Hypotheses guide the scientific process and help advance our understanding of the physical world.
Q: What is the role of mathematics in formulating physics hypotheses?
A:
Mathematics plays a crucial role in formulating physics hypotheses by providing a precise language to express relationships between physical quantities. Mathematical models allow physicists to make quantitative predictions that can be tested experimentally, enhancing the specificity and testability of hypotheses.
Q: What is the relationship between a hypothesis and a model in physics?
A:
A hypothesis in physics is often expressed through a model, which is a simplified representation of a physical system or phenomenon. The model embodies the hypothesis by making specific predictions about the behavior of the system. Testing the model's predictions is equivalent to testing the underlying hypothesis.
Q: How do physicists decide between competing hypotheses?
A:
Physicists decide between competing hypotheses based on their explanatory power, predictive accuracy, and consistency with existing knowledge. They conduct experiments or observations to test the predictions of each hypothesis, favoring the one that best explains the data and aligns with established physical principles.

Hypothesis Examples

To understand the concept of hypothesis more clearly and completely, here are the examples of each type of hypothesis :

  • Simple hypothesis :

Icebergs melt as a result of global warming.

The cause in this case is global warming, and the effect is melting icebergs.

  • Complex hypothesis :

Global warming causes icebergs to melt which leads to significant changes in weather patterns.

The cause in this case is global warming but the effect is melting icebergs along with changing weather.

  • Null hypothesis :

Water has no effect on plant growth.

Logical hypothesis :

An animal cannot survive in the absence of water.

This is correct because all living things require water.

  • Empirical hypothesis :

Cotton clothing is preferable to velvet clothing in the summer.

  • Statistical hypothesis :

Vitamin C is beneficial to the skin.

To validate this hypothesis, you would need to test it on a group of people. This is a statistical approach to verifying the statement.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q: What is the role of dimensional regularization in developing hypotheses in quantum field theory?
A:
Dimensional regularization is a
Q: How do physicists use the concept of universality classes in formulating hypotheses about critical phenomena?
A:
Universality classes are groups of physical systems that exhibit similar behavior near critical points, regardless of their microscopic details. Physicists use this concept to formulate hypotheses about the behavior of complex systems undergoing phase transitions. It allows them to make broad predictions about diverse systems based on a few key parameters, greatly simplifying the study of critical phenomena.
Q: What is the significance of symmetry breaking in cosmological hypotheses?
A:
Symmetry breaking plays a crucial role in cosmological hypotheses, particularly in theories about the early universe. It's used to explain how the universe evolved from a highly symmetric state to its current, less symmetric state. Hypotheses involving spontaneous symmetry breaking have been instrumental in understanding phenomena like the separation of fundamental forces and the origin of particle masses.
Q: How do physicists use the concept of renormalization in formulating hypotheses about quantum field theories?
A:
Renormalization is a technique used in quantum field theory to handle infinities that arise in calculations. Physicists use this concept to formulate hypotheses about how physical quantities change with the scale at which they are observed. This approach has been crucial in developing consistent theories of particle interactions and understanding the behavior of systems across different energy scales.
Q: What is the role of thought experiments in testing the logical consistency of physics hypotheses?
A:
Thought experiments play a crucial role in testing the logical consistency of physics hypotheses by exploring their implications in idealized scenarios. They allow physicists to push theories to their logical extremes, revealing potential contradictions or unexpected consequences. Famous examples like Einstein's elevator or Schrödinger's cat have led to profound insights and new hypotheses.
Q: How do physicists use the concept of symmetry groups in developing hypotheses in particle physics?
A:
Symmetry groups are mathematical structures that describe the symmetries of physical systems. In particle physics, hypotheses about fundamental particles and their interactions are often formulated based on symmetry group considerations. This approach has been incredibly successful, leading to predictions of new particles and the development of the Standard Model of particle physics.
Q: What is the importance of consistency checks in formulating physics hypotheses?
A:
Consistency checks are crucial in formulating physics hypotheses to ensure that new ideas align with well-established principles and observations. Physicists verify that their hypotheses don't violate fundamental laws (like conservation of energy) and are consistent with existing successful theories within their domains of validity. This helps prevent logical contradictions and maintains the coherence of physical theories.
Q: How do physicists use perturbation theory in developing and testing hypotheses?
A:
Perturbation theory is a set of mathematical methods used to find approximate solutions to problems that cannot be solved exactly. Physicists use it to develop hypotheses by considering small changes or corrections to known solutions, allowing them to make predictions about more complex systems or situations where exact solutions are not feasible.
Q: What is the significance of symmetry arguments in developing physics hypotheses?
A:
Symmetry arguments are powerful tools in developing physics hypotheses. They suggest conservation laws, constrain possible interactions, and guide the formulation of fundamental theories. Many breakthrough hypotheses in physics, from the prediction of antimatter to the development of the Standard Model, have been based on symmetry considerations.
Q: What is the role of analogies between different areas of physics in hypothesis generation?
A:
Analogies between different areas of physics often inspire new hypotheses by suggesting that similar principles might apply in seemingly unrelated domains. For example, the analogy between sound waves and light waves led to hypotheses about the nature of light. Such cross-pollination of ideas can lead to unexpected insights and novel predictions.

Questions related to

On Question asked by student community

Have a question related to ?

In probability and statistics, null hypothesis is a default status that there is zero or nothing happened. Principle of null hypothesis proposes that there is no significant differences or relationship between two variables. It serves as starting point or default assumption that there is no real change.

Formula for null hypothesis -

Null hypothesis formula (Ho) : parameter = value

Ho : u1 = u2


Correct Answer: events, which are


Solution : Notice how this simplified version makes the grammatical error more obvious. The last part of the sentence, following the semicolon, is a dependent clause, because it starts with the pronoun “which.” This makes it wrong to use the semicolon. Only an independent clause - a clause that can stand alone as a sentence - may follow a semicolon. Read what follows the semicolon in this case, and you can probably “hear” that it cannot stand alone as a sentence.
To correct it, the connection between the final clause and the rest of the sentence needs to be repaired.

 

Correct Answer: Pierre Laplace


Solution : The correct option is Pierre Laplace.

The nebular hypothesis was first proposed by the French mathematician and astronomer Pierre-Simon Laplace in his work "Exposition du système du Monde" (Exposition of the System of the World), which was published in 1796. Laplace revised and expanded on earlier ideas, contributing significantly to the development of the nebular hypothesis.