Hypothesis - Definition, Characteristics, Sources, Types, Examples, Functions, FAQs
Edited By Team Careers360 | Updated on Jul 02, 2025 04:30 PM IST
Suppose you see that the plants are greener near the window than the plants kept in the corner of a room. As a result of this observation you will be left with more questions such as: Does the plant need the sun? Such questions lead to the theory of Hypothesis. A hypothesis is a statement that describes a relationship between variables, such as sunlight (cause) and plant growth (effect). This article defines the theory of hypothesis with examples that make it easier to understand.
This Story also Contains
- Characteristics of Good Hypothesis
- Sources of Hypothesis
- Types of Hypothesis
- Functions of hypothesis
- Hypothesis Examples
What is a Hypothesis?
Hypothesis is the starting of any investigation. It explains what is going to happen further and how the investigation will go through. It consists of variables, a population, and the relationship between the variables. A hypothesis in research is a theory used to test the relationship between two or more variables.
Characteristics of Good Hypothesis
A Hypothesis should have the following characteristics in order to be complete:
- It must come into direct contact with observable objects. It should not be based on fake belief, but rather on observation.
- A Hypothesis should be understandable to everyone including laymen. It should not contain scientific terms or definitions which are complex and difficult for anyone.
- A Hypothesis has to be specific and to the point. It should not roam around the topic or contain extra irrelevant information.
- It should also be able to provide new ideas and suggestions for the investigation.
Also read -
- NCERT Notes For All Subjects
- NCERT Solutions for All Subjects
- NCERT Exemplar Solutions for All Subjects
NEET Highest Scoring Chapters & Topics
This ebook serves as a valuable study guide for NEET exams, specifically designed to assist students in light of recent changes and the removal of certain topics from the NEET exam.
Download E-bookSources of Hypothesis
There are several sources of hypothesis but some of the important ones are given as follows :
- Previous study: Previous knowledge and information regarding the topic of the hypothesis will be extremely helpful in creating a concrete hypothesis.
- Personal experience: If one has a personal experience regarding the topic of investigation, he/she can use that information in the hypothesis to make it more complete and good quality.
- Thinking and imagination: A researcher's creative thinking and imagination can sometimes aid in the formulation of a good hypothesis. A researcher's personal ideas and thinking abilities would result in a greater number of hypothesis formulations as well as control over the problem.
- Scientific theory: It would be extremely helpful to use scientific theories in hypothesis because it is capable of explaining all the facts related to the investigation.
Types of Hypothesis
There are basically several types of Hypothesis but some of the common and important types of formulation of Hypothesis are explained below:
- Simple hypothesis: It is also known as a basic hypothesis. It depicts the relationship between two variables, one of which is known as the independent variable or ‘cause' and the other as the dependent variable or ‘effect.'
- Complex hypothesis: A complex hypothesis is one that has multiple dependent and independent variables.
- Null hypothesis: It contradicts the empirical hypothesis because it asserts that there is no relationship between the dependent and independent variables. It basically says that the data and variables being tested do not exist.
- Alternative hypothesis: It is also referred to as a sustained hypothesis or a research hypothesis. To begin, numerous hypotheses are proposed. The most efficient one is then chosen from among them. Alternative hypotheses are further classified into four main types
- Point alternative hypothesis
- Non-directional alternative hypothesis
- One-tailed directional hypothesis
- Two-tailed directional hypothesis
- Logical hypothesis: It is logically verified, as the name implies. The verification process entails the following steps:
- Agreement
- Disagreement
- Different points of view
- Empirical hypothesis: It is also known as a 'working hypothesis.' During the formulation phase, it is only an assumption, but once tested, it is no longer just an idea or notion. It is actually changing in relation to those independent variables.
- Statistical hypothesis: The statement could be logical or illogical, but if statistical evidence validates it, it becomes a statistical hypothesis.
|
Related Topics |
Functions of hypothesis
There are several functions of hypothesis. Some of them are given below:
- Hypothesis facilitates observation and experimentation.
- It serves as the investigation’s starting point.
- The hypothesis aids in the verification of the observations.
- It aids in steering inquiries in the right direction.
Hypothesis Examples
To understand the concept of hypothesis more clearly and completely, here are the examples of each type of hypothesis :
- Simple hypothesis :
Icebergs melt as a result of global warming.
The cause in this case is global warming, and the effect is melting icebergs.
- Complex hypothesis :
Global warming causes icebergs to melt which leads to significant changes in weather patterns.
The cause in this case is global warming but the effect is melting icebergs along with changing weather.
- Null hypothesis :
Water has no effect on plant growth.
Logical hypothesis :
An animal cannot survive in the absence of water.
This is correct because all living things require water.
- Empirical hypothesis :
Cotton clothing is preferable to velvet clothing in the summer.
- Statistical hypothesis :
Vitamin C is beneficial to the skin.
To validate this hypothesis, you would need to test it on a group of people. This is a statistical approach to verifying the statement.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
1. Define hypothesis.
A hypothesis is an assumption made on the basis of evidence. This is the starting point for any investigation in which the research questions are translated into a prediction.
2. What are the main types of hypothesis?
There are total 7 main types of hypothesis
Simple hypothesis
Complex hypothesis
Null hypothesis
Alternative hypothesis
Logical hypothesis
Empirical hypothesis
Statistical hypothesis
3. What are the four main sources of hypothesis?
The four main sources of hypothesis are:
Previous study
Personal experience
Thinking and imagination
Scientific theory
4. What is simple hypothesis?
A simple hypothesis is a type of hypothesis in which there are two variables one of which is independent variable and other one is dependent variable. It is also known as basic hypothesis.
5. What are the four types of alternative hypothesis?
Alternative hypothesis are further classified into four main types
Point alternative hypothesis
Non-directional alternative hypothesis
One-tailed directional hypothesis
Two-tailed directional hypothesis
6. What are the key characteristics of a good hypothesis in physics?
A good hypothesis in physics should be testable, falsifiable, specific, and based on existing knowledge. It should make clear predictions that can be verified or disproven through experiments or observations, and it should be stated in a way that allows for precise testing.
7. Can a hypothesis be proven true in physics?
Strictly speaking, a hypothesis cannot be proven true in physics or any science. It can only be supported by evidence or disproven. Even when a hypothesis is consistently supported by evidence, it remains open to potential falsification in the future if new contradictory evidence emerges.
8. How does the concept of falsifiability apply to hypotheses in physics?
Falsifiability is a crucial concept in physics, stating that a hypothesis must be capable of being proven false through observation or experimentation. If a hypothesis cannot be falsified in principle, it is not considered scientifically testable. This concept, introduced by Karl Popper, is fundamental to the scientific method in physics.
9. How does the concept of Occam's Razor apply to hypotheses in physics?
Occam's Razor, also known as the principle of parsimony, suggests that among competing hypotheses, the one with the fewest assumptions should be selected. In physics, this principle encourages simpler explanations over more complex ones when both adequately explain the observed phenomena, promoting more elegant and testable hypotheses.
10. What is the importance of quantitative predictions in physics hypotheses?
Quantitative predictions are crucial in physics hypotheses because they allow for precise testing and comparison with experimental results. They provide a clear benchmark for evaluating the accuracy of a hypothesis and enable physicists to distinguish between competing explanations that might qualitatively predict similar outcomes.
11. How does a hypothesis differ from a scientific theory?
A hypothesis is a tentative explanation or prediction that needs to be tested, while a scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of a natural phenomenon supported by a large body of evidence and repeated testing. Theories are more comprehensive and have withstood numerous attempts at falsification.
12. Why is formulating hypotheses important in physics research?
Formulating hypotheses is crucial in physics research because it provides a focused direction for investigation, helps design experiments, and allows for the systematic testing of ideas. Hypotheses guide the scientific process and help advance our understanding of the physical world.
13. What is the role of mathematics in formulating physics hypotheses?
Mathematics plays a crucial role in formulating physics hypotheses by providing a precise language to express relationships between physical quantities. Mathematical models allow physicists to make quantitative predictions that can be tested experimentally, enhancing the specificity and testability of hypotheses.
14. What is the relationship between a hypothesis and a model in physics?
A hypothesis in physics is often expressed through a model, which is a simplified representation of a physical system or phenomenon. The model embodies the hypothesis by making specific predictions about the behavior of the system. Testing the model's predictions is equivalent to testing the underlying hypothesis.
15. How do physicists decide between competing hypotheses?
Physicists decide between competing hypotheses based on their explanatory power, predictive accuracy, and consistency with existing knowledge. They conduct experiments or observations to test the predictions of each hypothesis, favoring the one that best explains the data and aligns with established physical principles.
16. How does the concept of paradigm shifts relate to hypotheses in physics?
Paradigm shifts, introduced by Thomas Kuhn, occur when a new hypothesis or theory fundamentally changes the way physicists understand and approach a field. These shifts often arise when existing hypotheses fail to explain accumulating anomalies, leading to the formulation of radically new hypotheses that better account for observations.
17. How do physicists handle hypotheses that can't be directly tested due to technological limitations?
When hypotheses can't be directly tested due to technological limitations, physicists often look for indirect evidence or consequences that can be observed. They may also develop new experimental techniques, use computer simulations, or wait for technological advancements. In some cases, they might reformulate the hypothesis to make it more testable with current capabilities.
18. What is the significance of "beautiful" or elegant hypotheses in physics?
"Beautiful" or elegant hypotheses in physics are those that explain complex phenomena with simple, unified principles. While aesthetic appeal alone doesn't determine a hypothesis's validity, historically, many groundbreaking theories in physics have been characterized by their elegance. This often reflects a deep underlying simplicity in nature's laws.
19. How do physicists handle hypotheses that challenge fundamental assumptions in their field?
When hypotheses challenge fundamental assumptions, physicists approach them with both skepticism and open-mindedness. They subject such hypotheses to rigorous testing and scrutiny, often requiring extraordinary evidence to support extraordinary claims. If the evidence is compelling, it can lead to paradigm shifts and major advancements in understanding.
20. What is the role of gedanken experiments (thought experiments) in formulating physics hypotheses?
Gedanken experiments, or thought experiments, play a crucial role in formulating physics hypotheses by allowing physicists to explore the logical consequences of theories in idealized scenarios. They help in developing intuition, identifying potential contradictions or paradoxes, and generating new hypotheses, especially in areas where physical experiments are impractical or impossible.
21. What role do anomalies play in the development of new hypotheses in physics?
Anomalies, or observations that contradict existing theories or expectations, often lead to the development of new hypotheses in physics. They highlight gaps in our understanding and prompt physicists to formulate new explanations that can account for both the anomalous observations and previously established knowledge.
22. How do physicists use thought experiments in developing hypotheses?
Physicists use thought experiments as mental tools to explore hypothetical scenarios and their logical consequences. These imaginary experiments help in developing hypotheses by allowing physicists to consider extreme or idealized situations that may be impossible to create in reality, leading to new insights and predictions.
23. What is the role of creativity in formulating physics hypotheses?
Creativity plays a vital role in formulating physics hypotheses by allowing scientists to think beyond established paradigms and imagine new possibilities. Creative thinking helps physicists connect seemingly unrelated concepts, propose novel explanations, and design innovative experiments to test their ideas.
24. How do physicists use the concept of symmetry in formulating hypotheses?
Symmetry is a powerful concept in physics that often guides hypothesis formulation. Physicists look for underlying symmetries in nature, which can suggest conservation laws and fundamental principles. Hypotheses that respect known symmetries or propose new ones have historically led to significant advances in understanding the fundamental laws of the universe.
25. How do physicists use dimensional analysis in developing hypotheses?
Dimensional analysis is a powerful tool in developing physics hypotheses. It helps physicists ensure that their proposed relationships between physical quantities are dimensionally consistent, which is a necessary (though not sufficient) condition for a valid hypothesis. It can also guide the formulation of equations by revealing how different quantities must be combined.
26. What is the difference between a null hypothesis and an alternative hypothesis in physics?
A null hypothesis in physics typically states that there is no significant effect or relationship between variables, while an alternative hypothesis proposes that there is a significant effect or relationship. The null hypothesis is what researchers try to disprove to support their alternative hypothesis.
27. What is the difference between a working hypothesis and a scientific hypothesis in physics?
A working hypothesis in physics is a tentative, practical assumption made to guide research or experimentation, even if not all aspects are fully developed or tested. A scientific hypothesis, on the other hand, is a more formal, well-developed proposition that makes specific, testable predictions based on existing knowledge and is intended to be rigorously evaluated.
28. What is the significance of ad hoc hypotheses in physics, and why are they often viewed skeptically?
Ad hoc hypotheses in physics are propositions introduced solely to explain a specific observation or save a theory from falsification, without independent justification. While sometimes necessary as placeholders, they are viewed skeptically because they lack predictive power beyond the specific case they were designed to explain and can hinder the development of more comprehensive theories.
29. How do physicists balance the need for novel hypotheses with the principle of conservation of established theories?
Physicists balance novelty and conservation by adhering to the principle of correspondence, which states that new theories should reduce to established ones in the domains where the old theories are well-tested. Novel hypotheses are encouraged, but they must explain not only new phenomena but also account for the successes of existing theories in their respective domains of validity.
30. How do physicists use the concept of universality in formulating hypotheses?
The concept of universality in physics suggests that certain phenomena exhibit similar behavior across different systems or scales. Physicists use this idea to formulate hypotheses that apply broadly, looking for underlying principles that govern diverse phenomena. This approach has led to powerful theories that unify seemingly disparate areas of physics.
31. What is a hypothesis in physics?
A hypothesis in physics is a proposed explanation or prediction about a natural phenomenon based on existing knowledge and observations. It's an educated guess that can be tested through experiments or further observations to either support or refute it.
32. What is the role of peer review in evaluating new hypotheses in physics?
Peer review plays a crucial role in evaluating new hypotheses in physics by subjecting them to scrutiny by experts in the field. This process helps identify potential flaws, suggests improvements, and ensures that the hypothesis and its supporting evidence meet the rigorous standards of scientific inquiry before being accepted by the broader scientific community.
33. How do physicists use analogies in developing and explaining hypotheses?
Physicists often use analogies to develop and explain hypotheses by drawing parallels between familiar concepts and new, abstract ideas. Analogies can provide intuitive understanding, inspire new ways of thinking about problems, and help communicate complex ideas to both peers and the public. However, physicists are careful to recognize the limitations of analogies and not over-extend them.
34. What is the role of Bayesian inference in evaluating hypotheses in physics?
Bayesian inference is a statistical approach used in physics to update the probability of a hypothesis as more evidence becomes available. It allows physicists to quantify the degree of belief in a hypothesis based on prior knowledge and new data, providing a formal framework for weighing evidence and comparing competing hypotheses.
35. What is the importance of reproducibility in testing physics hypotheses?
Reproducibility is crucial in testing physics hypotheses because it ensures that results are not due to chance, experimental error, or bias. A hypothesis gains strength when its predictions can be consistently verified by different researchers using various experimental setups. Reproducibility is a cornerstone of the scientific method and helps establish the reliability of scientific findings.
36. How do physicists use computer simulations in developing and testing hypotheses?
Computer simulations are powerful tools in physics for developing and testing hypotheses, especially for complex systems or scenarios that are difficult to study experimentally. They allow physicists to model the behavior of systems under various conditions, make predictions, and compare results with real-world observations, helping to refine hypotheses and guide experimental design.
37. What is the role of symmetry breaking in developing physics hypotheses?
Symmetry breaking is a crucial concept in physics hypothesis development. It describes how systems can transition from a symmetric state to one with reduced symmetry, often leading to the emergence of new phenomena. Hypotheses involving symmetry breaking have been instrumental in understanding phase transitions, particle physics, and cosmology.
38. How do physicists use dimensional analysis to check the plausibility of their hypotheses?
Dimensional analysis is used to check the plausibility of hypotheses by ensuring that all terms in an equation have consistent units. If a proposed relationship between physical quantities doesn't satisfy dimensional consistency, it's likely incorrect. This method can also suggest the form of unknown relationships, guiding hypothesis formulation.
39. What is the importance of falsifiability in physics hypotheses, and how does it differ from verifiability?
Falsifiability, introduced by Karl Popper, is crucial in physics because it requires that a hypothesis must be capable of being proven false through observation or experiment. This differs from verifiability, which only requires that a statement can be shown to be true. Falsifiability is considered more important because it allows for the potential rejection of incorrect hypotheses, driving scientific progress.
40. How do physicists use the concept of emergence in formulating hypotheses about complex systems?
The concept of emergence is used in physics to describe how complex systems can exhibit behaviors or properties not predictable from the individual components alone. When formulating hypotheses about such systems, physicists consider how collective behaviors might arise from simpler underlying rules, often leading to new insights and predictions about system-level phenomena.
41. What is the role of simplicity (or parsimony) in evaluating competing hypotheses in physics?
Simplicity, often expressed through Occam's Razor, plays a significant role in evaluating competing hypotheses. When two hypotheses explain the same phenomena equally well, physicists tend to prefer the simpler one. This principle helps avoid unnecessary complexity and often leads to more generalizable and testable theories.
42. How do physicists use scaling laws in formulating hypotheses about physical phenomena?
Scaling laws describe how physical quantities change with system size or other parameters. Physicists use these laws to formulate hypotheses about how phenomena might behave across different scales. This approach is particularly useful in areas like condensed matter physics and astrophysics, where direct experiments at all scales may not be feasible.
43. What is the significance of symmetry arguments in developing physics hypotheses?
Symmetry arguments are powerful tools in developing physics hypotheses. They suggest conservation laws, constrain possible interactions, and guide the formulation of fundamental theories. Many breakthrough hypotheses in physics, from the prediction of antimatter to the development of the Standard Model, have been based on symmetry considerations.
44. How do physicists use the concept of effective theories in formulating hypotheses?
Effective theories are approximations valid at a certain scale or energy range. Physicists use this concept to formulate hypotheses that capture the relevant physics at a particular scale without needing to account for all possible details. This approach allows for practical predictions and insights even when a complete, fundamental theory might be unknown or too complex to apply.
45. What is the role of analogies between different areas of physics in hypothesis generation?
Analogies between different areas of physics often inspire new hypotheses by suggesting that similar principles might apply in seemingly unrelated domains. For example, the analogy between sound waves and light waves led to hypotheses about the nature of light. Such cross-pollination of ideas can lead to unexpected insights and novel predictions.
46. How do physicists use perturbation theory in developing and testing hypotheses?
Perturbation theory is a set of mathematical methods used to find approximate solutions to problems that cannot be solved exactly. Physicists use it to develop hypotheses by considering small changes or corrections to known solutions, allowing them to make predictions about more complex systems or situations where exact solutions are not feasible.
47. What is the importance of consistency checks in formulating physics hypotheses?
Consistency checks are crucial in formulating physics hypotheses to ensure that new ideas align with well-established principles and observations. Physicists verify that their hypotheses don't violate fundamental laws (like conservation of energy) and are consistent with existing successful theories within their domains of validity. This helps prevent logical contradictions and maintains the coherence of physical theories.
48. How do physicists use the concept of symmetry groups in developing hypotheses in particle physics?
Symmetry groups are mathematical structures that describe the symmetries of physical systems. In particle physics, hypotheses about fundamental particles and their interactions are often formulated based on symmetry group considerations. This approach has been incredibly successful, leading to predictions of new particles and the development of the Standard Model of particle physics.
49. What is the role of thought experiments in testing the logical consistency of physics hypotheses?
Thought experiments play a crucial role in testing the logical consistency of physics hypotheses by exploring their implications in idealized scenarios. They allow physicists to push theories to their logical extremes, revealing potential contradictions or unexpected consequences. Famous examples like Einstein's elevator or Schrödinger's cat have led to profound insights and new hypotheses.
50. How do physicists use the concept of renormalization in formulating hypotheses about quantum field theories?
Renormalization is a technique used in quantum field theory to handle infinities that arise in calculations. Physicists use this concept to formulate hypotheses about how physical quantities change with the scale at which they are observed. This approach has been crucial in developing consistent theories of particle interactions and understanding the behavior of systems across different energy scales.
51. What is the significance of symmetry breaking in cosmological hypotheses?
Symmetry breaking plays a crucial role in cosmological hypotheses, particularly in theories about the early universe. It's used to explain how the universe evolved from a highly symmetric state to its current, less symmetric state. Hypotheses involving spontaneous symmetry breaking have been instrumental in understanding phenomena like the separation of fundamental forces and the origin of particle masses.
52. How do physicists use the concept of universality classes in formulating hypotheses about critical phenomena?
Universality classes are groups of physical systems that exhibit similar behavior near critical points, regardless of their microscopic details. Physicists use this concept to formulate hypotheses about the behavior of complex systems undergoing phase transitions. It allows them to make broad predictions about diverse systems based on a few key parameters, greatly simplifying the study of critical phenomena.
53. What is the role of dimensional regularization in developing hypotheses in quantum field theory?
Dimensional regularization is a
Also Read
Physical Quantity
02 Jul'25 05:44 PM
Unit of Time - SI Unit, CGS Unit & Other Time Units, FAQs
02 Jul'25 04:59 PM
Basic Laws of Physics - A Complete Guide
02 Jul'25 04:49 PM
Modern Physics - Definition, Father of Modern Physics, FAQs
02 Jul'25 04:32 PM
List of Physics Scientists and Their Inventions
02 Jul'25 04:31 PM
Articles
Jul 03, 2025
Questions related to
Have a question related to ?
In probability and statistics, null hypothesis is a default status that there is zero or nothing happened. Principle of null hypothesis proposes that there is no significant differences or relationship between two variables. It serves as starting point or default assumption that there is no real change.
Formula for null hypothesis -
Null hypothesis formula (Ho) : parameter = value
Ho : u1 = u2
Annu Kumari 01 December,2024
Correct Answer: events, which are
Solution : Notice how this simplified version makes the grammatical error more obvious. The last part of the sentence, following the semicolon, is a dependent clause, because it starts with the pronoun “which.” This makes it wrong to use the semicolon. Only an independent clause - a clause that can stand alone as a sentence - may follow a semicolon. Read what follows the semicolon in this case, and you can probably “hear” that it cannot stand alone as a sentence.
To correct it, the connection between the final clause and the rest of the sentence needs to be repaired.
Team Careers360 19 January,2024
Correct Answer: Pierre Laplace
Solution : The correct option is Pierre Laplace.
The nebular hypothesis was first proposed by the French mathematician and astronomer Pierre-Simon Laplace in his work "Exposition du système du Monde" (Exposition of the System of the World), which was published in 1796. Laplace revised and expanded on earlier ideas, contributing significantly to the development of the nebular hypothesis.
Team Careers360 14 January,2024
News and Notifications
Back to top