Download Careers360 App
Justice- Meaning and its Types

Justice- Meaning and its Types

Edited By Ritika Jonwal | Updated on Jul 02, 2025 05:46 PM IST

Justice is a moral and legal concept that describes how individuals behave in a way that is impartial, equitable, and fair to everyone. Justice is the most important and most debated objective of the state and society. It is the cornerstone of a human life lived in harmony. To ensure full equality, reasonable compensation, and an equitable distribution for everyone, justice demands that people's self-serving actions be regulated. The concept of Justice is provided under the legal studies topic.

This Story also Contains
  1. Meaning of the word "Justice"
  2. The Major Concept of Justice by Various Political Thinkers
  3. Kinds of Justice
  4. Types of Justice
  5. Conclusion
Justice- Meaning and its Types
Justice- Meaning and its Types

It stands for striking a balance between individual interests and group objectives. Justice is highly valued in political thought. To support or refute governmental laws, policies, judgements, and acts, appeals are filed on behalf of justice. Everybody who participates in any kind of activism to defend their rights always raises the banner "We Want Justice." In the end, all civil rights efforts are rationalisation campaigns.

Meaning of the word "Justice"

  • A wide concept, justice has an impact on almost every aspect of human existence.

  • The Latin word for justice, Junger, implies "to bind or tie together."

  • "Jus" can also mean "bond" or "tie."

  • According to this interpretation, a system of justice is one in which individuals are interconnected.

  • The goal of justice is to unite divergent viewpoints and structure all interpersonal interactions around it.

  • Justice therefore requires tying, uniting, or arranging individuals into a just or equitable relational order.

Evolution of Justice

  • The primary goal of justice in the prehistoric civilisation was to punish the criminals. The penalty was rather severe.

  • A tooth for a tooth and an eye for an eye was just one aspect of the judiciary. The aim was to deter such acts in the future.

  • Because of this, justice in the ancient worldview was entirely negative. It is predicated on accepted morals, habits, or traditions.

  • Political philosophers have characterised the idea in a variety of ways, starting with Plato (427–347) and continuing until the twenty-first century.

  • Justice is a matter of functional specialisation, according to Plato, the father of political philosophy, in his book THE REPUBLIC. His view of justice was philosophical or ethical rather than grounded in traditional morality.

  • If a person carried out the tasks for which he was qualified and trained, he would provide justice.

  • Furthermore, Plato believed that an organic society was the goal and that it was a characteristic of the soul and habit of thought. According to Plato, fairness is the highest virtue.

You can also Check

The Major Concept of Justice by Various Political Thinkers

  • Aristotle: Aristotle defined justice as the combination of the lawful and the just, while fairness is the impartial allocation and the perfection of the unequal. Since he believes that justice is the fundamental value of the state, it is equally vital to him. A state is founded on justice, which also gives it a vision and, when paired with ethics, elevates the state to the highest moral standard.

  • Plato: Justice, according to Plato, is a component of human virtue and the thread that unites people in society. That is the quality that makes a guy moral and gregarious. As vital to the soul as health is to the body, justice is an order and duty of the elements that make up the soul. Justice is not a legal but a moral ideal, according to Plato.

  • Rawls: Rawls argued that rather than utilitarian ideologies, the optimal condition of nature should be one of equal resource distribution. According to his Theory of Justice, every person has an equal right to fundamental freedoms and ought to be afforded the same opportunities and chances as others with comparable abilities.

  • Cephalus: He established the classic philosophy of justice and served as a representative of the traditional morals of the former merchant class. "Justice consists in speaking the truth and paying one's debt," he said. Cephalus consequently identifies moral behaviour with fairness.

  • Salmond: Justice refers to giving each person their fair share.

  • Aquinas: He promoted a pro-rata mutuality-based legal system. In other words, everyone who is virtuous gives to others what they are due in accordance with their obligations. Your duties to them will be based on both civil and moral law, so this won't be the same for everyone.

They highlight the idea of justice in different philosophers' philosophies. Although virtue and politics are justice's key characteristics, there isn't a single, widely recognised definition of justice. A given scenario and the laws that were in effect at the time define what justice is.

The Consequences of Justice

The following consequences flow from the idea of justice:

  • It necessitates a just situation.

  • It is under moral principles.

  • It conveys the idea of fair distribution of gains and losses and, as an exception, typically predominates in non-democratic settings.

Kinds of Justice

There exist three primary forms of justice:

Social Justice

Nowadays, a great many scholars would rather define justice as "social justice." The equality of all people in a society, free from prejudice based on their position, colour, sex, religion, caste, or creed, is known as social justice. On the other hand, there are many different ways that scholars understand the concept of social justice. Some contend that distributing everyone's fair share of the social pie is necessary for social justice. Some contend that the fair allocation of social benefits and rights by the rule of law and justice constitutes social justice.

Economic Justice

Economic justice and social justice are closely related since the market economy is always a part of the social structure. Economic prospects and rights for individuals are frequently entwined with the broader social structure in which they are situated. To achieve economic justice, every person must have equal opportunity to earn a living and reasonable compensation, which will allow them to meet their fundamental needs and support their development. The government need to make sure that people are financially secure when they are ill, aged, or unable to work.

Political justice

Equitable political rights and opportunities for participation in national governance must be extended to every person to attain political justice. Voting should be open to all citizens without fear of discrimination based on social status, gender, race, class, religion, or place of birth. Every qualified voter and public office candidate needs to be afforded equal opportunity. Legal justice has two aspects: the creation of just standards and the application of justice in conformity with those standards. The will of the rulers should not be imposed onto the will of the ruled while creating legislation. The wishes of the state and the general public should direct legislation. The significance of societal values, ethics, customs, and the feeling of good and wrong must always be remembered.

Legal Justice

Legal justice is the application of the rule of law, not the application of any particular norm. It declares that everyone is treated equally by the law and that all men are equal before it. It guarantees that the law protects everyone. The rich and the impoverished are treated equally by the law. Legal justice requires the impartial and correct administration of justice by courts of law. The judicial system ought to be clear-cut, efficient, quick, equitable, and reasonably priced. Effective mechanisms should be in place to discourage illicit activity.

Types of Justice

There are four categories of justice:

Distributive Justice:

  • It emphasises the equitable distribution of resources among community members.

  • It guarantees that everyone receives resources, opportunities, and other social advantages that they are entitled to.

Procedural Justice:

  • Worried about how equitable and open the procedures are for resolving conflicts and allocating funds.

  • Highlights the significance of impartial rule application and fair and uniform processes.

Retributive Justice:

  • Focuses on the proper penalty for misconduct.

  • It strives to implement the "an eye for an eye" principle by making sure that criminals get punishments commensurate with the crimes they have committed.

Restorative Justice:

  • It aims to undo the damage done by illegal activity.

  • Its goals include relationship restoration and victim reparation, involving the offender, victim, and community in the healing process.

The Essentials of Justice

  • The most important and hotly contested objective of the state and society is justice.

  • The idea of justice served as the foundation for almost all political ideas of the ideal state put out by different thinkers.

  • Justice is the name on which appeals are filed in support of or opposition to the policies, laws, and regulations of any government or other authority.

  • Because justice is so important to our society, every civil rights struggle is an important step towards achieving justice.

  • Justice is among the most significant moral principles in the legal and political spheres.

  • Without justice, political and legal systems are unable to uphold the desired state of law and order.

  • Over time, the idea of justice grew. Without it, people find it impossible to lead fulfilling lives.

  • It guarantees and shields individuals against a range of discriminatory practices in society.

Conclusion

"Justice" is regarded as an ideal aim rather than a legal system. It is a utopian concept. The idea of justice changes with time. In popular culture, the concepts of justice, fairness, moral righteousness, and equality are all used to refer to getting what one deserves. The expression "justice as fairness" has gained notoriety in social scientific fields due to Rawls' impact. It also serves as a full explanation of the concept of justice. Because of its nature, justice is difficult to describe.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. Which four categories of justice exist?

According to this article, justice may be divided into four categories: distributive justice, which decides who receives what, procedural justice, which decides how fairly individuals are treated, retributive justice, which is centred on punishing wrongdoers, and restorative justice, which aims to put relationships back to "rightness." 

2. Which four categories of justice exist?

According to this article, justice may be divided into four categories: distributive justice, which decides who receives what, procedural justice, which decides how fairly individuals are treated, retributive justice, which is centred on punishing wrongdoers, and restorative justice, which aims to put relationships back to "rightness."

3. What does justice imply, and why is it important?

Justice is essentially about giving everyone what they deserve, or to put it more conventionally, giving everyone what is rightfully theirs. Fairness and justice are closely related concepts that are frequently used synonymously in modern use

4. What does justice mean to you?

The state of being just; righteousness, equity, or moral rectitude: maintaining the fairness of a cause. Justness of cause or reason; legitimacy of a claim or title; the ability to file a complaint fairly.

5. Which four tiers of justice are there?

In society, justice is administered on four levels: personal, civil, criminal, and social. Every one of the tiers of justice has issues and ways to address them. Although the issues can overlap significantly, there are greater restrictions on the types of remedy available at each different level of justice.

6. What is meant by "justice must be seen to be done," and why is it important?
This phrase emphasizes the importance of transparency and public confidence in the justice system. It means that justice should not only be done but should be clearly and publicly seen to be done, maintaining trust in the legal process and its outcomes.
7. What role does equity play in the concept of justice?
Equity in justice recognizes that treating everyone exactly the same may not always result in fairness. It allows for consideration of individual circumstances and aims to achieve fair outcomes by sometimes treating different cases differently based on their unique contexts.
8. How does the principle of "justice delayed is justice denied" impact the legal system?
This principle emphasizes the importance of timely resolution in legal matters. Delays in legal proceedings can lead to evidence deterioration, witness unavailability, and prolonged uncertainty for involved parties, potentially compromising the quality and effectiveness of justice delivered.
9. How does the concept of natural justice influence legal proceedings?
Natural justice is a fundamental principle that ensures fairness in legal proceedings. It includes two main rules: the right to a fair hearing (audi alteram partem) and the rule against bias (nemo judex in causa sua). These principles aim to guarantee that decisions are made impartially and with full consideration of all parties' perspectives.
10. How does the concept of proportionality relate to justice in sentencing?
Proportionality in sentencing ensures that the punishment fits the crime. It requires that sentences be commensurate with the severity of the offense and the culpability of the offender, balancing societal protection, deterrence, and the rights of the accused.
11. What is the fundamental meaning of justice in legal studies?
Justice in legal studies refers to the fair and equitable application of laws and principles to ensure that individuals receive what they are due. It involves balancing rights, responsibilities, and societal needs to create a just and harmonious society.
12. How does the concept of "justice for all" challenge the legal system?
"Justice for all" challenges the legal system to ensure equal access and fair treatment regardless of socioeconomic status, race, gender, or other factors. It requires addressing systemic biases, improving legal aid services, and creating inclusive policies to make justice truly accessible to everyone.
13. What is the relationship between justice and the rule of law?
The rule of law is fundamental to justice, ensuring that laws are applied equally and fairly to all members of society, including those in power. It provides a framework for consistent and predictable application of justice, protecting individual rights and limiting arbitrary exercise of power.
14. How does the concept of transitional justice apply in post-conflict societies?
Transitional justice refers to the ways countries emerging from periods of conflict and repression address large-scale human rights violations. It aims to achieve accountability, serve justice, and promote reconciliation through mechanisms like truth commissions, reparations programs, and institutional reforms.
15. How does the principle of "equality before the law" contribute to justice?
Equality before the law is a cornerstone of justice, ensuring that all individuals, regardless of their status or background, are subject to the same laws and entitled to equal protection. This principle aims to prevent discrimination and promote fair treatment in legal proceedings.
16. What is the significance of "justice as fairness" in John Rawls' theory?
John Rawls' concept of "justice as fairness" proposes that just principles for society should be chosen from behind a "veil of ignorance," where individuals don't know their place in society. This approach aims to create principles that are fair to all, regardless of social position or natural endowments.
17. How does the concept of justice differ from mere law enforcement?
Justice goes beyond simply enforcing laws. While law enforcement focuses on maintaining order and compliance with rules, justice considers the broader implications of legal decisions, aiming to achieve fairness, equity, and moral rightness in society.
18. What is meant by "blind justice," and is it truly achievable?
"Blind justice" refers to the ideal of impartiality in the legal system, symbolized by the blindfolded Lady Justice. It suggests that justice should be administered without regard to wealth, power, or other status. While this ideal is crucial, achieving perfect impartiality is challenging due to inherent human biases and societal inequalities.
19. What role does mercy play in the concept of justice?
Mercy in justice involves tempering strict application of the law with compassion and understanding. It recognizes that sometimes rigid adherence to rules may lead to unjust outcomes, allowing for consideration of mitigating circumstances or personal reform in decision-making processes.
20. How does the principle of double jeopardy relate to justice?
The principle of double jeopardy, which prevents a person from being tried twice for the same offense, is crucial for justice. It protects individuals from repeated prosecutions, ensures finality in legal proceedings, and prevents the state from using its resources to wear down and convict an individual through repeated trials.
21. What are the main types of justice discussed in legal studies?
The main types of justice discussed in legal studies are distributive justice, procedural justice, retributive justice, and restorative justice. Each type addresses different aspects of fairness and equity in society and the legal system.
22. How does retributive justice differ from revenge?
Retributive justice is a systematic, proportional response to wrongdoing within the legal framework, aimed at holding offenders accountable and deterring future crimes. Unlike revenge, which is personal and often disproportionate, retributive justice seeks to balance the scales of justice through appropriate punishment.
23. What is the primary goal of restorative justice?
The primary goal of restorative justice is to repair the harm caused by criminal behavior. It focuses on rehabilitation, reconciliation between offenders and victims, and reintegration of offenders into the community, rather than solely on punishment.
24. How does the concept of social justice relate to legal justice?
Social justice extends beyond legal justice to address broader societal inequalities. While legal justice focuses on applying laws fairly, social justice aims to create equal opportunities, rights, and treatment for all members of society, often influencing legal reforms and policy changes.
25. How does distributive justice relate to the allocation of resources in society?
Distributive justice focuses on the fair allocation of resources, benefits, and burdens in society. It considers how goods, services, opportunities, and wealth should be distributed among members of a community based on principles of equality, need, or merit.
26. What is procedural justice, and why is it important in the legal system?
Procedural justice refers to the fairness and transparency of the processes used to make legal decisions. It ensures that legal procedures are consistent, unbiased, and give all parties an equal opportunity to present their case, thereby maintaining public trust in the justice system.
27. How does economic inequality impact access to justice?
Economic inequality can significantly affect access to justice by limiting individuals' ability to afford legal representation, pay court fees, or take time off work for legal proceedings. This disparity can lead to unequal outcomes in the justice system, potentially favoring those with greater financial resources.
28. What is the role of precedent in ensuring consistent justice?
Precedent, the principle of following previously established legal decisions, plays a crucial role in ensuring consistent justice. It promotes predictability, fairness, and equal treatment under the law by requiring similar cases to be treated similarly, while still allowing for evolution of legal interpretations over time.
29. How does restorative justice differ from traditional punitive approaches?
Restorative justice focuses on healing and reconciliation rather than punishment. It involves all stakeholders - victims, offenders, and community members - in resolving how to deal with the aftermath of an offense and its implications for the future, aiming to restore relationships and prevent future harm.
30. What is the role of jury trials in ensuring justice?
Jury trials involve citizens in the justice process, allowing for community participation in legal decision-making. They aim to ensure that judgments reflect societal values and common sense, potentially counterbalancing professional legal perspectives and enhancing the perceived fairness of the justice system.
31. How does the concept of "environmental justice" expand traditional notions of justice?
Environmental justice extends the principles of fairness and equity to environmental issues. It addresses the disproportionate impact of environmental hazards on marginalized communities and advocates for equal protection from environmental and health risks for all people, regardless of race, color, national origin, or income.
32. What is the role of victim impact statements in achieving justice?
Victim impact statements allow those affected by crimes to express how the offense has impacted their lives during sentencing. They aim to give victims a voice in the justice process, potentially influencing sentencing decisions and contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the crime's effects.
33. What is the significance of "habeas corpus" in ensuring justice?
Habeas corpus, meaning "you may have the body," is a legal action that requires authorities to bring a detained individual before a court to determine if their detention is lawful. It is a crucial safeguard against arbitrary detention and unlawful imprisonment, protecting individual liberty and ensuring due process.
34. How does the concept of "universal jurisdiction" impact international justice?
Universal jurisdiction allows national courts to prosecute individuals for serious crimes against international law, such as genocide or crimes against humanity, regardless of where the crimes were committed or the nationality of the accused or victims. This principle expands the reach of justice for the most serious international crimes, potentially deterring future atrocities.
35. What is the role of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in achieving justice?
Alternative dispute resolution methods like mediation and arbitration offer ways to resolve conflicts outside of traditional court processes. ADR can provide more flexible, cost-effective, and less adversarial means of achieving justice, often leading to mutually satisfactory outcomes and preserving relationships between parties.
36. What is the significance of "truth and reconciliation commissions" in achieving justice in post-conflict societies?
Truth and reconciliation commissions are non-judicial bodies that investigate past human rights abuses. They aim to uncover the truth about past events, provide a platform for victims to be heard, and promote reconciliation in societies recovering from conflict or oppression. These commissions offer an alternative approach to justice that prioritizes healing and social reconstruction over punishment.
37. How does the principle of "proportionality" in international humanitarian law contribute to justice?
The principle of proportionality in international humanitarian law requires that the use of force in armed conflict be proportional to the military objective, minimizing civilian casualties and damage. This principle seeks to balance military necessity with humanitarian concerns, contributing to a more just conduct of warfare.
38. What is the role of "judicial review" in ensuring justice within a constitutional system?
Judicial review is the power of courts to examine the actions of legislative, executive, and administrative bodies and to determine whether such actions are consistent with the constitution. This process serves as a check on other branches of government, protecting individual rights and ensuring that laws and governmental actions align with constitutional principles of justice.
39. What is the difference between substantive and procedural justice?
Substantive justice focuses on the fairness of legal outcomes and decisions, ensuring they align with moral and ethical principles. Procedural justice, on the other hand, emphasizes the fairness of the processes and methods used to reach those decisions, regardless of the outcome.
40. What is meant by "social contract theory" in relation to justice?
Social contract theory posits that individuals consent to surrender some freedoms to the authority of the state in exchange for protection of their remaining rights and maintenance of social order. This forms the basis for understanding justice as a mutual agreement between citizens and the state.
41. What is the significance of "beyond reasonable doubt" in criminal justice?
The standard of "beyond reasonable doubt" in criminal cases sets a high bar for conviction, requiring that the evidence leaves no reasonable doubt about the defendant's guilt. This principle protects innocent individuals from wrongful conviction and maintains public confidence in the justice system.
42. How does the concept of "justice as a human right" influence international law?
Viewing justice as a human right emphasizes that access to fair and impartial legal processes is fundamental to human dignity. This perspective influences international law by promoting universal standards for legal systems, encouraging reforms, and supporting interventions to protect individuals' rights to justice globally.
43. How does the principle of "presumption of innocence" contribute to justice?
The presumption of innocence is a fundamental principle of justice that places the burden of proof on the prosecution. It protects individuals from arbitrary conviction and ensures that the accused are treated fairly throughout the legal process, maintaining the integrity of the justice system.
44. What is meant by "substantive due process" in the context of justice?
Substantive due process refers to the principle that laws must be fair and reasonable in content as well as application. It protects fundamental rights from government interference, ensuring that legal actions not only follow proper procedures but also serve a legitimate purpose and do not infringe on basic liberties.
45. What is the significance of "plea bargaining" in the justice system, and how does it relate to the concept of justice?
Plea bargaining is a negotiation process where defendants agree to plead guilty in exchange for reduced charges or sentences. While it can expedite case resolution and conserve court resources, it raises questions about justice, as it may prioritize efficiency over full exploration of facts and potentially pressure innocent defendants to plead guilty.
46. How does the principle of "nullum crimen sine lege" (no crime without law) contribute to justice?
This principle, meaning "no crime without law," is fundamental to justice as it prohibits retroactive criminalization of actions. It ensures that individuals can only be punished for actions that were explicitly prohibited by law at the time they were committed, protecting against arbitrary prosecution and promoting legal certainty.
47. How does the concept of "global justice" challenge traditional notions of state sovereignty?
Global justice extends principles of fairness and equity beyond national borders, addressing issues like wealth inequality, climate change, and human rights violations on an international scale. It challenges state sovereignty by arguing for universal moral standards and collective responsibility for global issues, potentially justifying international interventions.
48. How does the principle of "mens rea" (guilty mind) contribute to justice in criminal law?
Mens rea, or "guilty mind," is the mental element of a crime. It ensures that individuals are held accountable not just for their actions, but for their intentions or knowledge when committing those actions. This principle contributes to justice by distinguishing between intentional wrongdoing and accidental harm, allowing for more nuanced and fair application of criminal law.
49. What is meant by "therapeutic jurisprudence," and how does it relate to justice?
Therapeutic jurisprudence examines how legal processes affect the well-being of those involved. It seeks to make legal proceedings more therapeutic and less traumatic, considering the psychological and emotional impact of legal interventions. This approach aims to achieve justice while minimizing harm and promoting healing for all parties involved.
50. How does the principle of "stare decisis" (let the decision stand) contribute to justice?
Stare decisis, the doctrine of precedent, requires courts to follow earlier judicial decisions when similar disputes arise. This principle promotes consistency, predictability, and fairness in legal outcomes, ensuring that similar cases are treated alike and providing stability in the legal system while still allowing for gradual evolution of law.
51. What is meant by "distributive justice" in the context of social welfare policies?
Distributive justice in social welfare policies focuses on the fair allocation of society's benefits and burdens. It considers how resources, opportunities, and social goods should be distributed among different members of society, often balancing principles of equality, need, and merit to achieve a just distribution.
52. How does the concept of "intergenerational justice" expand our understanding of justice?
Intergenerational justice considers the rights and interests of future generations in current decision-making processes. It extends the scope of justice across time, addressing issues like environmental sustainability, national debt, and long-term resource management to ensure fairness between present and future generations.
53. What is meant by "retributive justice," and how does it differ from other forms of justice?
Retributive justice focuses on punishment as a response to wrongdoing, based on the idea that offenders deserve to suffer for their actions. Unlike restorative or rehabilitative approaches, retributive justice emphasizes accountability and deterrence through punitive measures, aiming to restore balance by imposing consequences proportional to the offense.
54. How does the concept of "procedural fairness" contribute to perceptions of justice?
Procedural fairness focuses on the perceived fairness of decision-making processes rather than outcomes. It involves principles such as giving all parties a voice, treating them with respect, and explaining decisions. Even when outcomes are unfavorable, procedural fairness can enhance perceptions of justice and increase acceptance of legal decisions.
55. How does the concept of "transformative justice" differ from traditional approaches to justice?
Transformative justice goes beyond addressing individual incidents to examine and change the underlying social conditions that give rise to harm. Unlike traditional punitive or even restorative approaches, it seeks to transform societal structures and relationships to prevent future harm, addressing root causes of injustice and promoting long-term social change.
Parliament of India

02 Jul'25 05:47 PM

Articles

Back to top