1. What is the Mass Flow Hypothesis?
The flow of nutrients and water in the phloem of plants due to hydrostatic pressure caused by osmotic gradients is explained by the Mass Flow Hypothesis.
2. What is the Mass Flow Hypothesis?
The Mass Flow Hypothesis is a theory explaining how sugars and other organic compounds are transported through the phloem tissue in plants. It proposes that these substances move from areas of high concentration (source) to areas of low concentration (sink) due to pressure differences created by osmosis.
3. Who proposed the Mass Flow Hypothesis?
A German plant physiologist, Ernst Munch, had proposed the hypothesis in the year 1930.
4. Who proposed the Mass Flow Hypothesis?
The Mass Flow Hypothesis was proposed by Ernst Münch, a German plant physiologist, in 1930. His theory remains the most widely accepted explanation for phloem transport in plants.
5. What are the roles of source and sink in the Mass Flow Hypothesis?
The source is the term given to the parts of the plant where sugars are produced, while sink refers to areas where sugars are either being used or stored, root for example.
6. What are some of the central objections to the Mass Flow Hypothesis?
The critics consider that it is an oversimplification of the transport process and ignores the active role of companion cells and also the differences in the rates of nutrient transport.
7. What is the significance of the Mass Flow Hypothesis to plants?
This would go a long way in explaining how the plants distribute their nutrients while maintaining, at the same time, physiological functions very essential to them for growth and survival.
8. What is the role of turgor pressure in the Mass Flow Hypothesis?
Turgor pressure is crucial in the Mass Flow Hypothesis. The high concentration of sugars in the phloem at the source creates high osmotic potential, drawing in water and increasing turgor pressure. This pressure drives the bulk flow of phloem sap towards areas of lower pressure.
9. What is the role of companion cells in the Mass Flow Hypothesis?
Companion cells play a crucial role in actively loading sugars into the phloem sieve tubes at the source. They use energy (ATP) to pump protons out, creating a gradient that drives the co-transport of sugars into the sieve tubes.
10. How fast does phloem sap move according to the Mass Flow Hypothesis?
Phloem sap can move at rates of 0.5 to 1 meter per hour, which is much faster than diffusion alone could achieve over long distances in plants.
11. What is the significance of plasmodesmata in the Mass Flow Hypothesis?
Plasmodesmata are channels connecting plant cells that allow for the symplastic loading of sugars from mesophyll cells into companion cells and sieve tubes, playing a crucial role in the initial stages of phloem transport.
12. How does the Mass Flow Hypothesis relate to the concept of source-sink relationships in plants?
The Mass Flow Hypothesis directly explains how source-sink relationships function. Sources (like mature leaves) produce and load sugars into the phloem, while sinks (like roots or fruits) remove and use these sugars, creating the pressure gradient that drives transport.
13. What are the key components involved in the Mass Flow Hypothesis?
The key components are: source tissues (like mature leaves), sink tissues (like roots or developing fruits), phloem sieve tubes, companion cells, and the sugar-water solution called phloem sap.
14. How does the Mass Flow Hypothesis differ from diffusion?
While diffusion involves the movement of molecules from high to low concentration without bulk flow, the Mass Flow Hypothesis describes the bulk movement of phloem sap driven by pressure differences, allowing for faster and more efficient transport over long distances.
15. What creates the pressure gradient in the Mass Flow Hypothesis?
The pressure gradient is created by active loading of sugars into the phloem at the source, which increases osmotic pressure and draws water into the sieve tubes. This creates a high hydrostatic pressure that pushes the phloem sap towards areas of lower pressure (sinks).
16. How does unloading occur at the sink tissues according to the Mass Flow Hypothesis?
At sink tissues, sugars are actively removed from the phloem sap and used for growth, storage, or metabolism. This lowers the osmotic potential, causing water to move out of the sieve tubes and reducing pressure, which maintains the flow from source to sink.
17. Can the Mass Flow Hypothesis explain the transport of substances other than sugars?
Yes, the Mass Flow Hypothesis explains the transport of various organic compounds, including amino acids, hormones, and some minerals, as they can all be carried along with the bulk flow of phloem sap.
18. Why is the Mass Flow Hypothesis called a "hypothesis" if it's widely accepted?
Despite being widely accepted, it's still called a hypothesis because some aspects of phloem transport are not fully understood, and scientists remain open to new evidence that might refine or challenge the theory.
19. What evidence supports the Mass Flow Hypothesis?
Evidence includes observed pressure gradients in phloem, the structure of sieve tubes optimized for bulk flow, radioactive tracer studies showing rapid movement of substances, and the ability to explain bidirectional transport in phloem.
20. What is the significance of the pressure flow mechanism in the Mass Flow Hypothesis?
The pressure flow mechanism is the core of the Mass Flow Hypothesis. It explains how the bulk movement of phloem sap occurs due to the pressure difference between source and sink, allowing for efficient long-distance transport of organic compounds.
21. What is the significance of phloem-xylem interactions in the context of the Mass Flow Hypothesis?
Phloem-xylem interactions are important in the Mass Flow Hypothesis. Water from the xylem enters leaves and then moves into the phloem due to osmosis, supporting the pressure gradient. Additionally, some substances can be exchanged between xylem and phloem, influencing overall plant resource distribution.
22. How does the Mass Flow Hypothesis explain bidirectional transport in phloem?
The Mass Flow Hypothesis can explain bidirectional transport because the direction of flow is determined by the location of sources and sinks. Different parts of a plant can act as sources or sinks at different times, allowing for changes in flow direction.
23. What happens to phloem transport during the night when photosynthesis stops?
While photosynthesis stops at night, phloem transport continues using stored sugars from leaves or other storage organs. The rate may decrease but doesn't stop entirely, ensuring continuous supply to growing parts and maintaining plant metabolism.
24. How does the structure of sieve tubes support the Mass Flow Hypothesis?
Sieve tubes have specialized structures called sieve plates with large pores, reduced cellular contents, and are connected end-to-end. This structure minimizes resistance to flow and optimizes them for the bulk flow of phloem sap, supporting the Mass Flow Hypothesis.
25. How does osmosis contribute to the Mass Flow Hypothesis?
Osmosis plays a crucial role by driving water movement into the phloem at the source due to high sugar concentration, and out of the phloem at the sink where sugars are removed. This osmotic action creates and maintains the pressure gradient essential for mass flow.
26. What would happen to phloem transport if a plant's leaves were removed?
Removing leaves would significantly reduce phloem transport as it eliminates major source tissues. The plant would rely on stored sugars from other parts, but overall transport would decrease, potentially affecting growth and development of sink tissues.
27. How does the Mass Flow Hypothesis explain the transport of sugars over long distances in tall trees?
The Mass Flow Hypothesis explains long-distance transport in tall trees through the continuous pressure gradient from source to sink. The high pressure at the source can push phloem sap over long distances, overcoming gravitational forces and resistance in sieve tubes.
28. What is the role of ATP in the Mass Flow Hypothesis?
ATP is crucial for active loading of sugars into the phloem at the source. It powers the proton pumps in companion cells, creating the electrochemical gradient necessary for sugar transport into sieve tubes, initiating the pressure gradient for mass flow.
29. How does temperature affect the process described by the Mass Flow Hypothesis?
Temperature affects the rate of phloem transport. Higher temperatures generally increase metabolic activities, including sugar production and loading, potentially speeding up transport. However, extremely high temperatures can disrupt cellular processes and reduce transport efficiency.
30. Can the Mass Flow Hypothesis explain how plants respond to pest attacks?
Yes, the Mass Flow Hypothesis can explain how plants transport defense compounds in response to pest attacks. When a plant is attacked, it can rapidly transport defensive molecules (like alkaloids or phenolics) through the phloem to affected areas.
31. What is the relationship between xylem and phloem transport in the context of the Mass Flow Hypothesis?
While the Mass Flow Hypothesis primarily explains phloem transport, it's interconnected with xylem transport. Water from the xylem enters leaf cells and then moves into the phloem due to osmosis, supporting the pressure gradient needed for mass flow in the phloem.
32. How does the Mass Flow Hypothesis account for the transport of hormones in plants?
The Mass Flow Hypothesis explains hormone transport in plants as these signaling molecules can be carried along with sugars in the phloem sap. This allows for rapid long-distance signaling from one part of the plant to another.
33. What would happen to phloem transport if a plant was exposed to prolonged darkness?
Prolonged darkness would reduce photosynthesis and sugar production, leading to decreased phloem loading at source tissues. This would slow down or potentially stop phloem transport as described by the Mass Flow Hypothesis, affecting plant growth and development.
34. How does the concept of symplastic and apoplastic loading relate to the Mass Flow Hypothesis?
The Mass Flow Hypothesis incorporates both symplastic (through plasmodesmata) and apoplastic (across cell membranes) loading methods. These are ways sugars enter the phloem at the source, initiating the concentration gradient necessary for mass flow.
35. What is the significance of sieve tube elements in the Mass Flow Hypothesis?
Sieve tube elements are the primary conduits for phloem sap flow in the Mass Flow Hypothesis. Their specialized structure, with reduced cellular contents and large sieve plate pores, minimizes resistance to flow and facilitates the pressure-driven transport of phloem sap.
36. How does the Mass Flow Hypothesis explain the phenomenon of phloem exudation when bark is cut?
When bark is cut, exposing the phloem, the Mass Flow Hypothesis explains the exudation of phloem sap as a result of the high hydrostatic pressure within the sieve tubes. This pressure, central to the hypothesis, causes the sap to flow out when the closed system is breached.
37. What role do solute potentials play in the Mass Flow Hypothesis?
Solute potentials are crucial in the Mass Flow Hypothesis. The high solute concentration (mainly sugars) at the source creates a low water potential, drawing water into the phloem and creating the pressure necessary for mass flow towards areas of higher water potential at the sink.
38. How does the Mass Flow Hypothesis account for the transport of minerals in the phloem?
While primarily explaining sugar transport, the Mass Flow Hypothesis also accounts for mineral transport in the phloem. Minerals can be dissolved in the phloem sap and carried along with the bulk flow, allowing for their redistribution throughout the plant.
39. What would happen to phloem transport according to the Mass Flow Hypothesis if a plant was water-stressed?
Water stress would affect phloem transport as described by the Mass Flow Hypothesis. Reduced water availability would decrease turgor pressure in the phloem, potentially slowing or disrupting the pressure-driven flow of phloem sap from source to sink.
40. How does the Mass Flow Hypothesis explain the transport of sugars to non-photosynthetic parts of a plant?
The Mass Flow Hypothesis explains this through the source-sink relationship. Photosynthetic parts (sources) load sugars into the phloem, creating high pressure. This drives the flow towards non-photosynthetic parts (sinks) where sugars are unloaded and used, maintaining the pressure gradient.
41. What is the significance of the concentration gradient in the Mass Flow Hypothesis?
The concentration gradient is fundamental to the Mass Flow Hypothesis. It creates the osmotic potential difference between source and sink, driving water movement into and out of the phloem. This, in turn, generates the pressure gradient that propels the bulk flow of phloem sap.
42. How does the Mass Flow Hypothesis explain seasonal changes in phloem transport?
The Mass Flow Hypothesis can explain seasonal changes in phloem transport. During growing seasons, leaves act as strong sources, driving robust phloem flow to growing parts. In dormant seasons, stored sugars in roots or stems become sources, reversing flow direction to support new growth.
43. What is the role of callose in phloem transport, and how does it relate to the Mass Flow Hypothesis?
Callose can form plugs in sieve plate pores, potentially blocking phloem transport. In the context of the Mass Flow Hypothesis, callose deposition can disrupt the continuous flow system, affecting the pressure gradient and thus the efficiency of mass flow.
44. How does the Mass Flow Hypothesis account for the transport of macromolecules in the phloem?
While primarily explaining small molecule transport, the Mass Flow Hypothesis can account for macromolecule movement. Large molecules like proteins or RNAs can be carried along with the bulk flow of phloem sap, although their transport may be slower due to size constraints in sieve tubes.
45. What is the significance of phloem unloading in the Mass Flow Hypothesis?
Phloem unloading at sink tissues is crucial in the Mass Flow Hypothesis. It maintains the concentration gradient by removing sugars from the phloem sap, lowering local osmotic potential. This continuous unloading sustains the pressure difference that drives mass flow from source to sink.
46. How does the Mass Flow Hypothesis explain the phenomenon of assimilate partitioning in plants?
The Mass Flow Hypothesis explains assimilate partitioning through the concept of sink strength. Different sinks (like fruits, roots, or growing tissues) compete for assimilates. Stronger sinks create steeper pressure gradients, attracting more phloem sap and thus more assimilates.
47. What is the role of aquaporins in the Mass Flow Hypothesis?
Aquaporins, water channel proteins, play a role in the Mass Flow Hypothesis by facilitating rapid water movement into and out of cells. This is crucial for creating and maintaining the osmotic gradients that drive the pressure flow in phloem transport.
48. How does the Mass Flow Hypothesis explain the transport of signals for flowering in plants?
The Mass Flow Hypothesis can explain the transport of flowering signals (like florigen) through the phloem. These signals can be loaded into the phloem at leaves and transported along with sugars to shoot apices, where they trigger the flowering response.
49. What would happen to phloem transport as described by the Mass Flow Hypothesis if a plant was exposed to extreme cold?
Extreme cold could disrupt phloem transport as described by the Mass Flow Hypothesis. Cold temperatures can reduce metabolic activities, slowing sugar production and loading. It may also increase sap viscosity and potentially cause freezing, all of which would impede mass flow.
50. How does the Mass Flow Hypothesis account for the bidirectional transport of some substances in the phloem?
The Mass Flow Hypothesis explains bidirectional transport through changing source-sink relationships. Different plant parts can act as sources or sinks at different times, allowing flow direction to change. Additionally, some substances may move against the bulk flow through active transport mechanisms.
51. How does the Mass Flow Hypothesis explain the phenomenon of phloem translocation in the absence of living sieve tube elements?
The Mass Flow Hypothesis primarily relies on living sieve tube elements. In their absence, such as in some primitive plants, transport would be limited to diffusion or active transport in parenchyma cells, which would be much slower and less efficient than mass flow.
52. What is the role of sucrose in the Mass Flow Hypothesis?
Sucrose is the primary sugar transported in most plants and plays a central role in the Mass Flow Hypothesis. Its high concentration in source tissues creates the osmotic gradient that drives water into the phloem, generating the pressure needed for mass flow.
53. How does the Mass Flow Hypothesis account for the transport of amino acids in the phloem?
The Mass Flow Hypothesis explains amino acid transport in the phloem as part of the bulk flow of phloem sap. Amino acids can be loaded into the phloem along with sugars at source tissues and carried to sink tissues where they are used for protein synthesis or other metabolic processes.
54. What is the significance of sieve tube turgor pressure in the Mass Flow Hypothesis?
Sieve tube turgor pressure is crucial in the Mass Flow Hypothesis. The high turgor pressure at the source, created by sugar loading and subsequent water influx, provides the driving force for the bulk flow of phloem sap towards areas of lower pressure at the sink.
55. How does the Mass Flow Hypothesis explain the rapid long-distance signaling in plants, such as in response to wounding?
The Mass Flow Hypothesis can explain rapid long-distance signaling by demonstrating how signaling molecules (like hormones or small RNAs) can be quickly transported through the phloem along with the bulk flow of sap. This allows for fast communication between distant parts of the plant in response to stimuli like wounding.