What Is Bagging and Boosting in Machine Learning?

Edited By Team Careers360 | Updated on Feb 14, 2024 05:19 PM IST | #Machine Learning

Machine learning has evolved significantly over the years, and one of the most powerful techniques to enhance model performance is ensemble learning. Ensemble learning involves combining multiple models to create a more robust predictor than any individual model. Two popular methods within ensemble learning are Bagging and Boosting, each with its unique approach and advantages.

What Is Bagging and Boosting in Machine Learning?

In this article, we will explore the details what is ensemble learning, explore Bagging and Boosting, difference between bagging and boosting. But before learning about bagging and boosting in machine learning, consider learning these popular Machine Learning Certification Courses.

Also Read:

Understanding Ensemble Learning

Ensemble learning is founded on the principle that combining the predictions of multiple models can often yield more accurate and reliable results than relying on a single model. The intuition behind ensemble learning is that while individual models may make errors on certain instances, the errors are likely to be diverse. By aggregating their predictions, ensemble methods can mitigate the impact of individual model weaknesses and leverage their collective strengths.

Ensemble learning can be applied to various machine learning algorithms, including decision trees, neural networks, and support vector machines. The resulting ensemble model is generally more robust, stable, and less prone to overfitting or underfitting than individual models.

Bagging: Bootstrap Aggregating

Bagging in machine learning, short for Bootstrap Aggregating, is a popular ensemble technique designed to reduce variance and enhance the stability of a model. The core idea behind Bagging is to create multiple subsets of the training data by sampling with replacement, known as bootstrapping. Each subset is used to train a base model independently.

The final prediction in Bagging is obtained by averaging or taking a vote (for classification problems) of the predictions from all the individual models. The diversity introduced by training on different subsets helps reduce overfitting and increases the overall generalisation of the model.

Notable algorithms employing Bagging include Random Forest, which is an ensemble of decision trees. Random Forest in bagging or boosting combines the strengths of multiple decision trees, each trained on a different subset of the data, resulting in a more robust and accurate model.

Also Read:

Boosting: Iterative Model Improvement

Boosting is another ensemble technique, but unlike Bagging, it focuses on reducing bias and improving the accuracy of a model. Boosting builds a sequence of weak learners, where each new model corrects the errors of its predecessor. The process is iterative, and at each step, the model gives more weight to instances that were misclassified in the previous steps.

Popular boosting algorithms include AdaBoost (Adaptive Boosting) and Gradient Boosting. AdaBoost assigns different weights to each training instance, emphasising the importance of misclassified samples. Gradient Boosting builds decision trees sequentially, with each tree addressing the residuals (errors) of the combined model from the previous iteration.

Also Read: Free Machine Learning Courses & Certifications

Similarities Between Bagging and Boosting in Machine Learning

Bagging and Boosting in machine learning, two prominent ensemble techniques, share fundamental principles that underscore their effectiveness in improving model robustness. Despite their distinctive approaches to tackling variance and bias, respectively, these methodologies exhibit striking similarities. Both Bagging and Boosting involve the construction of an ensemble through the utilisation of base models, each contributing to the collective predictive power.

While Bagging and Boosting have distinct approaches, they share some common principles:

Ensemble Construction

Both Bagging and Boosting in machine learning involve constructing multiple models and combining their predictions to form a stronger ensemble. Both these techniques employ multiple base learners to create a stronger model.

Use of Base Models

Both techniques use a base model as the building block of the ensemble. In Bagging, each base model is trained independently, while in Boosting, each new model corrects the errors of the previous ones.

Diversity

Both Bagging and Boosting aim to introduce diversity among the base models. In Bagging, diversity is achieved by training on different subsets of the data, and in Boosting, it comes from iteratively adjusting the model's focus on misclassified instances.

Difference Between Bagging and Boosting

While both techniques share the goal of constructing robust ensembles from base models, they diverge in fundamental ways. Bagging, an acronym for Bootstrap Aggregating, centres on reducing variance and fortifying stability by training independent models on different subsets of the data.

On the other hand, Boosting, an iterative approach to model refinement, concentrates on diminishing bias and enhancing accuracy by sequentially adjusting models based on the errors of their predecessors. Despite their similarities, Bagging and Boosting differ in their core objectives and the mechanisms by which they achieve them:

Objective

Bagging aims to reduce variance and increase stability by averaging or voting over independently trained models. In contrast, Boosting aims to reduce bias and enhance accuracy by iteratively adjusting the model based on the mistakes of previous models.

Weighting of Instances

In Bagging, all instances in the training data are given equal weight, and each base model is trained independently. In Boosting, more emphasis is placed on instances that were misclassified in previous iterations, adjusting their importance throughout the training process.

Parallelism

Bagging allows for parallel training of base models since they are independent of each other. Boosting, on the other hand, is a sequential process, where each model depends on the performance of the previous ones, limiting parallelization. However, some iterations can work in small parallel processes such as training multiple weak models.

Handling Outliers

Bagging is generally more robust to outliers, as the impact of individual models is reduced through averaging or voting. Boosting can be sensitive to outliers, as it tries to correct mistakes from previous iterations, potentially emphasising the impact of outliers.

Related: Machine Learning Certification Courses By Top Providers

Conclusion

Ensemble learning, with its Bagging and Boosting techniques, stands as a powerful tool in the machine learning toolkit. Bagging excels in reducing variance and enhancing stability, while Boosting focuses on refining accuracy by iteratively adjusting the model. Understanding the similarities and difference between bagging and boosting is crucial for selecting the most suitable approach based on the characteristics of the data and the specific goals of the task.

As the field continues to evolve, ensemble learning remains a key strategy for building robust and high-performing predictive models in order to accelerate a successful career as a machine learning engineer.

Frequently Asked Question (FAQs)

1. What is Ensemble in Machine Learning?

Ensemble in machine learning refers to the technique of combining predictions from multiple models to create a more robust and accurate predictor than any individual model.

2. What is Bagging and Boosting in Machine Learning?

Bagging is an ensemble learning technique that involves training multiple models independently on different subsets of the data. Boosting is another ensemble learning technique that builds a sequence of models iteratively, each correcting the errors of its predecessor.

3. What is the Difference Between Bagging and Boosting?

The main difference lies in their objectives and approach. Bagging aims to reduce variance and increase stability by training independent models on different data subsets, while Boosting focuses on reducing bias and improving accuracy by iteratively adjusting models to correct errors made by previous ones.

4. What is the main objective of Bagging, and how does it achieve this goal?

The main objective of Bagging is to reduce variance and increase stability in the model. This is achieved by training multiple models independently on different subsets of the data, introducing diversity to mitigate overfitting.

5. What is the significance of diversity among base models in ensemble learning?

Diversity among base models is significant in ensemble learning because it ensures that errors made by one model are compensated by correct predictions from others, leading to a more reliable and accurate ensemble.