Potential Due To Hollow Conductiong, Solid Conducting, Hollow Non Conducting

Potential Due To Hollow Conductiong, Solid Conducting, Hollow Non Conducting

Vishal kumarUpdated on 02 Jul 2025, 07:57 PM IST

Wonder what happens to the electric potential around variously charged objects? This may be a hollow conducting sphere, a solid conducting sphere, or even a hollow non-conducting sphere since each of these geometries does something different with electric charges. The concepts learned from studying electric potentials developed for such figures make up the foundation necessary to aid the understanding of a lot of principal ideas in electrostatics, of very critical significance in the design and analysis of electronic devices and systems.

This Story also Contains

  1. Electric Potential due to Hollow conducting, Hollow non-conducting, Solid Conducting Sphere-
  2. Electric Potential due to Uniformly Charged Non conducting Sphere
  3. Solved Examples Based On Potential Due To Hollow Conducting, Solid Conducting, Hollow Non-Conducting

Further, we discuss that the article, Potential Due To Hollow Conduction, Solid Conducting, and Hollow Non-conducting is important for board exams and comparative exams. This concept is in the class 12th electrostatic chapter. Questions asked from these competitive exams like the JEE Main, NEET, and other entrance exams such as SRMJEE, BITSAT, WBJEE, BCECE and more. Over the last ten years of the JEE Main exam (from 2013 to 2023), a total of fourteen questions have been asked on this concept. And for NEET four questions were asked from this concept.

Electric Potential due to Hollow conducting, Hollow non-conducting, Solid Conducting Sphere-

In the case of Hollow conducting, Hollow non-conducting, Solid conducting Spheres charges always reside on the surface of the sphere.

If the charge on a conducting sphere of radius R is Q. we want to find V at point P at distance r from the centre of the sphere.

  • Outside the sphere (P lies outside the sphere. I.e r>R)

$\dpi{100} E_{out}=\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon _{0}}\frac{Q}{r^{2}}=\frac{\sigma R^{2}}{\epsilon _{0}r^{2}}$

$V(r)=-\int_{r=\infty}^{r=r} \vec{E}.d \vec{r} =\frac{1}{4 \pi \varepsilon_{0}} \frac{\vec{Q}}{r}$

  • Inside the sphere (P lies inside the sphere. I.e r<R )
NEET Highest Scoring Chapters & Topics
This ebook serves as a valuable study guide for NEET exams, specifically designed to assist students in light of recent changes and the removal of certain topics from the NEET exam.
Download E-book

$E_{in}=0$

$V_{in}=constant$ and it is given as

$\boldsymbol{V}(\boldsymbol{r})=-\int_{r=\infty}^{r=r} \overrightarrow{\boldsymbol{E}} . d \vec{r} =-\int_{\infty}^{R} \boldsymbol{E}_{r}(d \boldsymbol{r})-\int_{R}^{r} \boldsymbol{E}_{r}(\boldsymbol{d} \boldsymbol{r})=\frac{1}{4 \pi \boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_{0}} *\frac{\boldsymbol{q}}{ {\boldsymbol{R}}}+0 \\ \\ \Rightarrow V(r)=\frac{1}{4 \pi \boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_{0}} *\frac{\boldsymbol{q}}{ {\boldsymbol{R}}}$

  • At the surface of Sphere (I.e at r=R)

$E_{s}=\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon _{0}}\frac{Q}{R^{2}}=\frac{\sigma }{\epsilon _{0}}$

$V_{s}=\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon _{0}}\frac{Q}{R}=\frac{\sigma R}{\epsilon _{0}}$

  • The graph between (E vs r) and (V vs r) is given below


Electric Potential due to Uniformly Charged Non conducting Sphere

Suppose charge Q is uniformly distributed in the volume of a non-conducting sphere of Radius R.

And we want to find V at point P at distance r from the center of the sphere.

  • Outside the sphere (P lies outside the sphere. I.e r>R)

$E_{out}=\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon _{0}}\frac{Q}{r^{2}}$ $V_{out}=\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon _{0}}\frac{Q}{r}$

$E_{out}=\frac{\rho R^{3}}{3 \epsilon _{0}r^{2}}$ $V_{out}=\frac{\rho R^{3}}{3 \epsilon _{0}r}$

  • Inside the sphere (P lies inside the sphere. I.e r<R )

$E_{in}=\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon _{0}}\frac{Qr}{R^{3}}$ $\dpi{100} V_{in}=\frac{Q}{4\pi \epsilon _{0}}*\frac{3R^{2}-r^{2}}{2R^{3}}$

$\dpi{100} E_{in}=\frac{\rho r}{3 \epsilon _{0}}$ $V_{in}=\frac{\rho \left ( 3R^{2}-r^{2} \right )}{6 \epsilon _{0}}$

  • At the surface of Sphere (I.e at r=R)

$E_{s}=\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon _{0}}\frac{Q}{R^{2}}$ $V_{s}=\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon _{0}}\frac{Q}{R}$

$\dpi{100} E_{s}=\frac{\rho R}{3 \epsilon _{0}}$ $V_{s}=\frac{\rho R^{2}}{3 \epsilon _{0}}$

Note - If P lies at the centre of the uniformly charged non-conducting sphere (I.e at r=0)

$V_{centre}=\frac{3}{2}\times \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon _{0}}\frac{Q}{R}=\frac{3}{2}V_{s}$

i.e$\dpi{100} V_{c}> V_{s}$

  • The graph between (E vs r) and (V vs r) is given below

Recommended Topic Video

Solved Examples Based On Potential Due To Hollow Conducting, Solid Conducting, Hollow Non-Conducting

Example 1: A solid conducting sphere having a charge Q is surrounded by an uncharged concentric conducting hollow spherical shell. Let the potential difference between the surface of the solid sphere and that of the outer surface of the hollow shell be V. If the shell is now given a charge of –3Q, the new potential difference between the same two surfaces is

1) V

2)2V

3)4V

4)-2V

Solution:

The electric field in between the shell and sphere is $\\ E \pi x^{2}=\frac{Q_{e n}}{\epsilon_{0}}=\frac{Q}{\epsilon_{0}} \text{(using Gauss's law)} \\ E=\frac{Q}{4 \pi \varepsilon_{0} x^{2}}$

The potential difference between the shells is

$\mathrm{dV}=\mathrm{V}_{\mathrm{r}}-\mathrm{V}_{\mathrm{R}}=\int_{\mathrm{r}}^{\mathrm{R}} \mathrm{Edx}=\int_{r}^{R} \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} \mathrm{x}^{2}} d x=\frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}}(1 / r-1 / R)$

Thus, $\mathrm{V}=\frac{\mathrm{Q}}{4 \pi \varepsilon_{0}}(1 / \mathrm{r}-1 / \mathrm{R})$

As the potential difference between a solid sphere and a hollow shell depends on the radii of two spheres and the charge on the inner sphere, Since the two values have not changed, the potential difference does not change. Hence the potential difference remains V.

Example 2: A spherical shell of radius R = 1.5 cm has q = 20 $\mu C$ uniformly distributed over it. The force exerted by one half over the other half is

1)0

2)10-2 N

3)500 N

4)2000 N

Solution:

$\\*E=\frac{\sigma }{2\epsilon_0}\Rightarrow F=E.dQ=\frac{\sigma dA\sigma }{2\epsilon_0}\\*P=\frac{F}{dA}=\frac{\sigma ^{2}}{2\epsilon_0}\\*F=P\pi R^{2}=\frac{\sigma ^{2}}{2\epsilon_0}.\pi R^{2}=\frac{Q^{2}}{32\pi \epsilon_ 0R^{2}}=2000N$

Example 3: A conducting sphere of radius R is given a charge Q. Consider three points B at the surface, A at the centre and C at a distance R/2 from the centre. The electric potential at these points is such that

1) $V_{A}=V_{B}=V_{C}$

2)$V_{A}=V_{B}\neq V_{C}$

3)$V_{A}\neq V_{B}\neq V_{C}$

4)$V_{A}\neq V_{B}= V_{C}$

Solution:

As we learned

Inside the sphere (P lies inside the sphere) -

$E_{in}=0$

$V_{in}=constant$

- wherein

The potential inside a conductor is always constant and equal to the potential at the surface.

Example 4: Which of the following is correct

1)for charged non-conducting sphere $V_{centre}>V_{surface}>V_{out}$

2)for charged non-conducting sphere $V_{centre}\leq V_{surface}>V_{out}$

3)for charged non-conducting sphere $V_{centre}> V_{surface}= V_{out}$

4)for charged non-conducting sphere $V_{centre}> V_{surface}\equiv V_{out}$

Solution:

As we learned

Potential - If P lies at the centre of the uniformly charged non-conducting sphere -

$V_{centre}=\frac{3}{2}\times \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon _{0}}\frac{Q}{R}=\frac{3}{2}V_{s}$

i.e$\dpi{100} V_{c}> V_{s}$

$V_{centre}=\frac{3}{2}\times \frac{1}{4\pi \varepsilon _{0}}\cdot \frac{Q}{R}=\frac{3}{2}V_{s}$

Example 5: A charge Q is distributed over two concentric conducting thin spherical shells radii r and R (R>r). If the surface charge densities on the two shells are equal, the electric potential at the common centre is ;

1)$\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon _0}\frac{\left ( 2R+r \right )}{\left ( R^2+r^2 \right )}Q$

2)$\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon _0}\frac{\left (R+r \right )}{2\left ( R^2+r^2 \right )}Q$

3)$\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon _0}\frac{\left (R+r \right )}{\left ( R^2+r^2 \right )}Q$
4)$\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon _0}\frac{\left (R+2r \right )Q}{2\left ( R^2+r^2 \right )}$

Solution:

$\begin{array}{l} \mathrm{Q}_{1}=\sigma 4 \pi \mathrm{r}^{2} \\ \mathrm{Q}_{2}=\sigma 4 \pi \mathrm{R}^{2} \end{array}$

Where ${Q}_{1}$= charge on the inner shell and ${Q}_{2}$= charge on the outer shell

and $Q={Q}_{1}+{Q}_{2}$

So

$\begin{array}{l} Q=\sigma 4 \pi\left(r^{2}+R^{2}\right) \\ \sigma=\frac{Q}{4 \pi\left(r^{2}+R^{2}\right)} \end{array}$

$\begin{array}{l} \mathrm{V}_{\mathrm{C}}=\frac{\mathrm{KQ}_{1}}{\mathrm{r}}+\frac{\mathrm{KQ}_{2}}{\mathrm{R}} =\frac{\mathrm{K} \sigma 4 \pi \mathrm{r}^{2}}{\mathrm{r}}+\frac{\mathrm{K} \sigma 4 \pi \mathrm{R}^{2}}{\mathrm{R}} =\mathrm{K} \sigma 4 \pi(\mathrm{r}+\mathrm{R}) \\ \\ V_C=\frac{\mathrm{KQ} 4 \pi(\mathrm{r}+\mathrm{R})}{4 \pi\left(\mathrm{r}^{2}+\mathrm{R}^{2}\right)} =\frac{\mathrm{KQ}(\mathrm{r}+\mathrm{R})}{\left(\mathrm{r}^{2}+\mathrm{R}^{2}\right)} =\frac{\mathrm{Q}(\mathrm{r}+\mathrm{R})}{4\pi\epsilon _0\left(\mathrm{r}^{2}+\mathrm{R}^{2}\right)}\end{array}$

Summary:
Because material properties differ, and charges are distributed differently in these cases, the electric potential will become different for a hollow conducting, solid conducting, and hollow non-conducting sphere. In the case of a hollow conducting sphere, charges reside on the surface and hence produce a uniform potential inside. For a solid conducting sphere, the charges will distribute on the surface and produce uniform potential inside. In these instances, however, the potential distributions turn out to be different in the case of a hollow non-conducting sphere, for it does not conduct charges. Getting a grip on these differences is very crucial in applications in electronics and physics.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q: Why can't magnetic monopoles exist inside a hollow superconductor, drawing a parallel with electric charges in a hollow conductor?
A:
Magnetic monopoles can't exist inside a hollow superconductor, similar to how net electric charges can't exist inside a hollow conductor. In both cases, the interior is shielded from external fields. However, while this is due to charge redistribution in conductors, in superconductors it's due to persistent currents (Meissner effect).
Q: How would the capacitance change if you filled a hollow spherical capacitor with a conducting material?
A:
If you filled a hollow spherical capacitor with a conducting material, the capacitance would decrease. This is because the effective distance between the charges would increase, as all charge would now reside on the outermost and innermost surfaces of the two spheres.
Q: How does the concept of image charges apply to problems involving hollow conductors?
A:
The method of image charges can be used for hollow conductors by placing an image charge inside the conductor to maintain the boundary condition of constant potential on the surface. This technique is particularly useful for calculating fields outside the conductor.
Q: How does the principle of hollow conductors apply to lightning rods?
A:
Lightning rods don't need to be hollow to function, but they use the principle that charge accumulates at sharp points of conductors. This creates a high electric field near the tip, ionizing the air and providing a preferred path for lightning, protecting the structure below.
Q: How does the concept of electric field screening in hollow conductors relate to the skin effect in AC circuits?
A:
Electric field screening in hollow conductors is similar to the skin effect in AC circuits. Both involve the tendency of electric fields (or currents in the AC case) to be confined near the surface of a conductor. However, the skin effect is a dynamic phenomenon dependent on frequency, while screening is a static effect.
Q: How does the behavior of a hollow conductor in an electric field relate to the concept of electrostatic equilibrium?
A:
A hollow conductor in an electric field demonstrates electrostatic equilibrium. The charges redistribute on its surface to make the field inside zero and the potential constant. This state, where no net movement of charge occurs, defines electrostatic equilibrium.
Q: How does the concept of electrostatic pressure apply to a hollow charged conductor?
A:
Electrostatic pressure occurs due to the repulsion between like charges on the surface of a conductor. In a hollow charged conductor, this pressure acts outward on the outer surface. There's no inward pressure on the inner surface because there's no field or net charge there.
Q: What would happen if you placed a hollow conductor inside a uniform electric field?
A:
If you placed a hollow conductor in a uniform electric field, the free charges in the conductor would redistribute, creating an induced field that exactly cancels the external field inside the cavity. The field outside would be distorted, but the interior would remain field-free.
Q: How does the presence of a dielectric material inside a hollow conductor affect the electric field and potential?
A:
A dielectric inside a hollow conductor doesn't affect the field or potential in the conducting material or outside it. However, it can affect the field and potential distribution within the cavity, depending on its dielectric properties and any charges present.
Q: What is meant by the term "electrostatic cavity"?
A:
An electrostatic cavity refers to the space inside a hollow conductor. It's characterized by having zero electric field and constant potential when the conductor is in electrostatic equilibrium, regardless of external fields or charges.