Definite Integral as Limit of a Sum

Definite Integral as Limit of a Sum

Edited By Komal Miglani | Updated on Jul 02, 2025 07:59 PM IST

Definite integral as the limit of a sum is one of the important parts of Calculus, which applies to measuring the change in the function at a certain point. Mathematically, it forms a powerful tool by which slopes of functions are determined, the maximum and minimum of functions found, and problems on motion, growth, and decay, to name a few. These concepts of integration have been broadly applied in branches of mathematics, physics, engineering, economics, and biology.

Definite Integral as Limit of a Sum
Definite Integral as Limit of a Sum

In this article, we will cover the concept of Definite integral as the limit of a sum . This concept falls under the broader category of Calculus, which is a crucial Chapter in class 12 Mathematics. It is not only essential for board exams but also for competitive exams like the Joint Entrance Examination (JEE Main), and other entrance exams such as SRMJEE, BITSAT, WBJEE, BCECE, and more. Over the last ten years of the JEE Main exam (from 2013 to 2023), thirteen questions have been asked on this concept, including six in 2021, one in 2018, three in 2022, and four in 2023.

Definite integral as the limit of a sum

Definite integration calculates the area under a curve between two specific points on the x-axis.

Let f be a function of x defined on the closed interval [a, b] and F be another function such that $\frac{d}{d x}(F(x))=f(x)$ for all x in the domain of f, then

$\int_a^b f(x) d x=[F(x)+c]_a^b=F(b)-F(a)$is called the definite integral of the function f(x) over the interval [a, b], where a is called the lower limit of the integral and b is called the upper limit of the integral.

Let f(x) be a continuous real-valued function defined on the closed interval [a, b] which is divided into n parts as shown in the figure.

Each subinterval denoted as $\left[x_0, x_1\right],\left[x_1, x_2\right], \ldots\left[x_{i-1}, x_i\right], \ldots,\left[x_{n-1}, x_n\right]$ having equal width $\frac{b-a}{n}$ where, $x_0=a$ and $x_n=b$.

$
\Rightarrow \quad x_i-x_{i-1}=\frac{b-a}{n} \quad \text { for } i=1,2,3, \ldots, n
$

We denote the width of each subinterval with the notation $\Delta x$, so $\quad \Delta x=\frac{b-a}{n}$ and $x_i=x_0+i \Delta x$

On each subinterval,$\left.x_{i-1}, x_i\right]$ (for $\left.i=1,2,3, \ldots, n\right)$ a rectangle is constructed with width Δx and height equal to$f\left(x_{i-1}\right)$ which is the function value at the left endpoint of the subinterval. Then the area of this rectangle is s $f\left(x_{i-1}\right) \Delta x$. Adding the areas of all these rectangles, we get an approximate value for A

$\begin{aligned} A \approx L_n & =f\left(x_0\right) \Delta x+f\left(x_1\right) \Delta x+\cdots+f\left(x_{n-1}\right) \Delta x \\ & =\sum_{i=1}^n f\left(x_{i-1}\right) \Delta x\end{aligned}$

$\mathrm{L}_n$ to denote that this is a left-endpoint approximation of A using n subintervals.

The second method for approximating the area under a curve is the right-endpoint approximation. It is almost the same as the left-endpoint approximation, but now the heights of the rectangles are determined by the function values at the right of each subinterval.

This time the height of the rectangle is determined by the function value f(xi) at the right endpoint of the subinterval. Then, the area of each rectangle is f(xi)Δx and the approximation for A is given by

$\begin{aligned} A \approx R_n & =f\left(x_1\right) \Delta x+f\left(x_2\right) \Delta x+\cdots+f\left(x_n\right) \Delta x \\ & =\sum_{i=1}^n f\left(x_i\right) \Delta x\end{aligned}$

As $\mathrm{n} \rightarrow \infty$ strips become narrower and narrower, it is assumed that the limiting values of $L_n$ and $R_n$ are the same in both cases and the common limiting value is the required area under the curve.

Symbolically, we write

$\begin{aligned} & \lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} \mathrm{L}_n=\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} \mathrm{R}_{\mathrm{n}}=\text { area of the region }=\int_a^b f(x) d x \\ & \int_a^b f(x) d x=\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} \sum_{i=1}^n f\left(x_i\right) \Delta x=\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} \sum_{i=1}^n\left(\frac{b-a}{n}\right) f\left(a+\left(\frac{b-a}{n}\right) i\right) \\ & \text { where, } \quad \Delta x=\frac{b-a}{n} \text { and } x_i=x_0+\Delta x . i\end{aligned}$

NOTE:

  1. If $\mathrm{a}=0, \mathrm{~b}=1$, then

$\int_0^1 f(x) d x=\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} \sum_{i=0}^{n-1} \frac{1}{n} f\left(\frac{i}{n}\right)$

  1. From the definition of definite integral, we have

NEET Highest Scoring Chapters & Topics
This ebook serves as a valuable study guide for NEET exams, specifically designed to assist students in light of recent changes and the removal of certain topics from the NEET exam.
Download E-book

$\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=\varphi(n)}^{\psi(n)} f\left(\frac{i}{n}\right)=\int_a^b f(x) d x$, where
(i) $\quad \Sigma$ is replaced by $\int$ sign
(ii) $\frac{i}{n}$ is replaced by $x$
(iii) $\frac{1}{n}$ is replaced by $d x$
(iv) To obtain the limits of integration, we use $\mathrm{a}=\lim _{\mathrm{n} \rightarrow \infty} \frac{\phi(\mathrm{n})}{\mathrm{n}}$ and $\mathrm{b}=\lim _{\mathrm{n} \rightarrow \infty} \frac{\psi(\mathrm{n})}{\mathrm{n}}$

For example:

$\begin{aligned} & \lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} \sum_{r=1}^{p . n} \frac{1}{n} f\left(\frac{r}{n}\right)=\int_\alpha^\beta f(x) d x \\ & \text { where, } \alpha=\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac{r}{n}=0(\text { as } r=1) \\ & \text { and } \quad \beta=\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac{r}{n}=p(\text { as } r=p n)\end{aligned}$

Recommended Videos Based on Integration as Limit of Sum


Solved Examples Based on Integration as Limit of Sum

Example 1: $\int_0^3\{x\} d x$

1) 2

2) 3/2

3) 4

4) 5

Solution

As we learned

Definite Integrals as the limit of a sum -

$\int_0^l f(x) d x=\lim _{x \rightarrow \infty} \sum \frac{1}{x} f\left(\frac{r}{x}\right)$

Or

$\int_a^b f(x) d x=\lim _{x \rightarrow \infty} h \sum_{r=0}^x f(a+r h)$

- wherein

Where $f(x)$ is a continuous function in $[0, l]$

Where $h=\frac{b-a}{x}$ And $f(x)$ is continuous in $[a, b]$

$\int_0^3\{x\}=\int_0^1\{x\} d x+\int_1^2\{x\} d x+\int_2^3\{x\} d x$

$=3 / 2$

Example 2: $\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty}\left[\frac{1}{n}+\frac{n}{(n+1)^2}+\frac{n}{(n+2)^2}+\ldots \ldots \ldots \ldots \ldots+\frac{n}{(2 n-1)^2}\right]$ is equal to:

1) $\frac{1}{2}$
2) 1
3) $\frac{1}{3}$
4) $\frac{1}{4}$

Solution

$\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty}\left[\frac{1}{n}+\frac{n}{(n+1)^2}+\frac{n}{(n+2)^2}+\ldots+\frac{n}{(2 n-1)^2}\right]$

$\begin{aligned} & =\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} \sum_{r=0}^{n-1} \frac{n}{(n+r)^2}=\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} \sum_{r=0}^{n-1} \frac{n}{n^2+2 n r+r^2} \\ & =\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{n} \sum_{r=0}^{n-1} \frac{1}{(r / n)^2+2(r / n)+1}\end{aligned}$

$=\int_0^1 \frac{\mathrm{dx}}{(\mathrm{x}+1)^2}=\left[\frac{-1}{(\mathrm{x}+1)}\right]_0^1=\frac{1}{2}$

Hence, the answer is the option (1).

Example 3: $\left.\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty}\left(\frac{(n+1)^{\frac{1}{3}}}{(n)^{\frac{4}{3}}}\right)+\frac{(n+2)^{\frac{1}{3}}}{(n)^{\frac{4}{3}}}+\ldots \ldots \ldots+\frac{(2 n)^{\frac{1}{3}}}{(n)^{\frac{4}{3}}}\right)$ is equal to:

1) $\frac{3}{4}(2)^{\frac{4}{3}}-\frac{3}{4}$
2) $\frac{4}{3}(2)^{\frac{4}{3}}$
3) $\frac{3}{4}(2)^{\frac{4}{3}}-\frac{4}{3}$
4) $\frac{4}{3}(2)^{\frac{3}{4}}$

Solution

$\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty}\left(\frac{(n+1)^{\frac{1}{3}}}{(n)^{\frac{4}{3}}}+\frac{(n+2)^{\frac{1}{3}}}{(n)^{\frac{4}{3}}}+\ldots \ldots \ldots \ldots+\frac{(2 n)^{\frac{1}{3}}}{(n)^{\frac{4}{3}}}\right)$

$=\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{n}\left[\left(1+\frac{1}{n}\right)^{\frac{1}{3}}+\left(1+\frac{2}{n}\right)^{\frac{1}{3}}+\ldots \ldots \ldots+\left(1+\frac{n}{n}\right)^{\frac{1}{3}}\right]$

$\begin{aligned} & =\frac{1}{n} \sum_{r=1}^n\left(1+\frac{r}{n}\right)^{\frac{1}{3}} \\ & =\int_0^1(1+x)^{\frac{1}{3}} d x=\frac{3}{4}\left(2^{\frac{4}{3}}-1\right)\end{aligned}$

Hence, the answer is option (1).

Example 4: $\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty}\left(\frac{n^2}{\left(n^2+1\right)(n+1)}+\frac{n^2}{\left(n^2+4\right)(n+2)}+\frac{n^2}{\left(n^2+9\right)(n+3)}+\ldots+\frac{n^2}{\left(n^2+n^2\right)(n+n)}\right)$

1) $\frac{\pi}{8}+\frac{1}{4} \log _e 2$
2) $\frac{\pi}{4}+\frac{1}{8} \log _e 2$
3) $\frac{\pi}{4}-\frac{1}{8} \log _{\mathrm{e}} 2$
4) $\frac{\pi}{8}+\log _c \sqrt{2}$

Solution:

$\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty}\left(\frac{n^2}{\left(n^2+1\right)(n+1)}+\frac{n^2}{\left(n^2+4\right)(n+2)}+\cdots+\frac{n^2}{\left(n^2+n^2\right)(n+n)}\right)$

$=\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} \sum_{r=1}^n \frac{n^2}{\left(n^2+r^2\right)(n+r)}$

$=\int_0^1 \frac{1}{\left(1+x^2\right)(1+x)} d x$

$\begin{aligned} & =\frac{1}{2} \int_0^1 \frac{1}{1+x} d x+\frac{1}{2} \int_b^1 \frac{d x}{1+x^2}-\frac{1}{4} \int_0^1 \frac{2 x}{\left(1+x^2\right)} d x \\ & =\frac{1}{2}[\ln (1+x)]_0^1+\frac{1}{2}\left[\tan ^{-1} x\right]_0^1-\frac{1}{4}\left[\ln \left(1+x^2\right)\right]_0^1 \\ & =\frac{1}{2} \ln 2+\frac{\pi}{8}-\frac{1}{4} \ln 2 \\ & =\frac{\pi}{8}+\frac{1}{4} \log e^2\end{aligned}$

Hence, the answer is the option (1).

Example 5: If $\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac{(n+1)^{k-1}}{n^{k+1}}[(n k+1)+(n k+2)+\ldots+(n k+n)$$=33 \cdot \lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{n^{k+1}} \cdot\left[1^k+2^k+3^k+\ldots+n^k\right]$,

then the integral value of $k$ is equal to _______.

1) 5

2) 9

3) 8

4) 6

Solution

$\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac{(n+1)^{k-1}}{n k+1}[n k \cdot n+1+2+\cdots+n]$

$=\lim _{\mathrm{n} \rightarrow \infty} \frac{(\mathrm{n}+1)^{\mathrm{k}-1}}{\mathrm{n}^{\mathrm{k}+1}} \cdot\left[\mathrm{n}^2 \mathrm{k}+\frac{(\mathrm{n}(\mathrm{n}+1)}{2}\right]$

$\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac{(n+1)^{k-1} \cdot n^2\left(k+\frac{\left(1+\frac{1}{n}\right)}{2}\right)}{n k+1}$

$\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty}\left(1+\frac{1}{n}\right)\left(k+\frac{\left(1+\frac{1}{n}\right)}{2}\right)$

$\Rightarrow\left(k+\frac{1}{2}\right)$

RHS

$\Rightarrow \lim _{\mathrm{n} \rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{\mathrm{nk}+1}\left(1^{\mathrm{k}}+2^{\mathrm{k}}+\cdots+\mathrm{h}^{\mathrm{k}}\right)=\frac{1}{\mathrm{k}+1}$

LHS=RHS

$\Rightarrow \mathrm{k}+\frac{1}{2}=33 \cdot \frac{1}{\mathrm{k}+1}$

$\begin{aligned} & \Rightarrow(2 k+1)(k+1)=66 \\ & \Rightarrow(k-5)(2 k+13)=0 \\ & \Rightarrow k=5 \text { or } \frac{13}{9}\end{aligned}$

Hence, the answer is the (5).

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What is the fundamental idea behind representing a definite integral as the limit of a sum?
The fundamental idea is to approximate the area under a curve by dividing it into smaller rectangles and then taking the limit as the number of rectangles approaches infinity. This process connects the concept of area to the summation of infinitesimally small pieces, forming the foundation of integral calculus.
2. How does the concept of Riemann sums relate to definite integrals?
Riemann sums are finite approximations of the area under a curve, created by dividing the interval into subintervals and summing the areas of rectangles. As the number of subintervals approaches infinity, the Riemann sum approaches the definite integral, providing a concrete way to understand the integral as a limit of sums.
3. Why do we use the symbol ∫ for integration, and how does it relate to the concept of summation?
The integration symbol ∫ is an elongated S, derived from the Latin word "summa" meaning sum. This symbolizes the connection between integration and summation, as a definite integral is essentially the limit of an infinite sum of infinitesimally small quantities.
4. What's the difference between left-hand, right-hand, and midpoint Riemann sums?
These terms refer to where the height of each rectangle is measured in a Riemann sum approximation. Left-hand sums use the function value at the left endpoint of each subinterval, right-hand sums use the right endpoint, and midpoint sums use the middle of each subinterval. The choice affects the accuracy of the approximation, with midpoint sums often being more accurate for the same number of subintervals.
5. How does the concept of limit play a crucial role in defining a definite integral?
The limit is essential because it allows us to transition from a finite sum (Riemann sum) to the exact area under the curve. As we increase the number of subintervals to infinity, the limit of the sum gives us the precise value of the definite integral, overcoming the limitations of finite approximations.
6. Why is it important to understand definite integrals as limits of sums, rather than just memorizing integration rules?
Understanding definite integrals as limits of sums provides a deeper conceptual grasp of what integration actually represents. It connects the abstract notion of area under a curve to concrete, finite approximations, helping students visualize the process and apply it to real-world problems more effectively.
7. How does the concept of definite integral as a limit of sum relate to the area under a curve?
The definite integral as a limit of sum directly represents the area under a curve. Each term in the sum represents a small rectangular area, and as we take the limit, these rectangles become infinitesimally thin, perfectly conforming to the curve's shape. The sum of all these infinitesimal areas gives the total area under the curve.
8. Can you explain the significance of the "n approaches infinity" part in the definition of a definite integral?
As "n approaches infinity," we're dividing the area into an infinite number of infinitesimally small rectangles. This process allows us to capture the exact shape of the curve, eliminating any error that would occur with a finite number of rectangles. It's what transforms our approximation into an exact calculation.
9. How does the concept of definite integral as a limit of sum extend to functions that are not always positive?
For functions that take both positive and negative values, the definite integral represents the net signed area. Positive function values contribute positive area above the x-axis, while negative values contribute negative area below the x-axis. The limit of sum concept still applies, but now some terms in the sum may be negative.
10. What's the connection between the definite integral as a limit of sum and the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus?
The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus provides a way to evaluate definite integrals using antiderivatives, seemingly bypassing the limit of sum process. However, the theorem is proved using the limit of sum definition, showing that these two approaches are equivalent. Understanding the limit of sum concept helps in grasping why the Fundamental Theorem works.
11. How does the choice of partition affect the Riemann sum approximation?
The partition determines how we divide the interval into subintervals. While equal-width partitions are common, non-uniform partitions can sometimes provide better approximations, especially for functions that change rapidly in certain regions. As the maximum width of any subinterval approaches zero, any partition will lead to the correct integral value in the limit.
12. Why do we typically use rectangular approximations in Riemann sums rather than other shapes?
Rectangles are used because they're simple to calculate and sum. Their areas are easy to compute (base * height), making the summation straightforward. Other shapes like trapezoids can be used and may give better approximations, but rectangles provide a good balance between simplicity and effectiveness, especially as we take the limit.
13. How does the concept of definite integral as a limit of sum relate to the notion of accumulation?
The definite integral as a limit of sum directly represents accumulation. Each term in the sum represents a small amount being accumulated, and as we take the limit, we're accumulating these amounts continuously. This makes integrals powerful tools for modeling situations where quantities accumulate over time or space.
14. Can you explain why a definite integral can be thought of as an infinite sum of infinitesimals?
As we increase the number of subintervals in our Riemann sum, each rectangle becomes infinitesimally thin. In the limit, we're essentially adding up an infinite number of these infinitesimally small areas. This perspective connects the discrete world of sums with the continuous world of integrals.
15. How does the Mean Value Theorem for Integrals relate to the concept of definite integral as a limit of sum?
The Mean Value Theorem for Integrals states that there exists a point in the interval where the function value, when multiplied by the interval width, equals the definite integral. This can be visualized using the limit of sum concept: it's like finding the height of a single rectangle that would give the same area as all the infinitesimal rectangles in the limit.
16. Why is it important to consider the continuity of a function when discussing definite integrals as limits of sums?
Continuity ensures that as we make our partitions finer, the function values used in our sum accurately represent the function's behavior. For discontinuous functions, we might miss important features as we take the limit, potentially leading to incorrect results. However, it's worth noting that definite integrals can be defined for some discontinuous functions under certain conditions.
17. How does the concept of definite integral as a limit of sum help in understanding improper integrals?
Improper integrals involve either infinite intervals or integrands with vertical asymptotes. The limit of sum concept helps us understand these as limits of proper integrals. We can visualize taking larger and larger finite intervals (or approaching closer to the asymptote) and seeing if the limit of these proper integral values exists.
18. Can you explain how the definite integral as a limit of sum relates to the concept of work in physics?
In physics, work is often calculated as force times distance. However, when force varies, we need to sum small amounts of work (force * small distance) over the entire path. This is precisely what the definite integral as a limit of sum represents: we're adding up infinitesimal amounts of work over the entire distance, capturing the varying nature of the force.
19. How does understanding definite integrals as limits of sums help in approximating integrals numerically?
Numerical integration methods like the trapezoidal rule or Simpson's rule are essentially sophisticated versions of Riemann sums. Understanding integrals as limits of sums helps us grasp why these methods work and how to improve their accuracy by increasing the number of subintervals.
20. Why is it that not all functions have antiderivatives, but we can still define their definite integrals using limits of sums?
The limit of sum definition of definite integrals is more fundamental and general than the antiderivative approach. It allows us to define integrals for a wider class of functions, including those without elementary antiderivatives. This is why we can integrate functions like e^(-x^2) over finite intervals despite not having a closed-form antiderivative.
21. How does the concept of definite integral as a limit of sum relate to the idea of average value of a function?
The average value of a function over an interval is defined as the definite integral of the function divided by the interval length. This can be understood through the limit of sum concept: we're essentially taking the average of infinitely many function values across the interval, weighted by infinitesimal widths.
22. Can you explain how the definite integral as a limit of sum relates to the concept of displacement in physics?
Displacement is the net change in position. When velocity varies, we can find displacement by integrating velocity over time. This integral represents the limit of summing small displacements (velocity * small time interval) as the time intervals become infinitesimally small, perfectly capturing the continuous nature of motion.
23. How does the concept of definite integral as a limit of sum help in understanding integration by parts?
While integration by parts is often taught as a formula, it can be derived using the product rule and the fundamental theorem of calculus. Understanding integrals as limits of sums helps explain why this technique works: we're essentially redistributing the accumulation process between two functions in a product.
24. Why is it that we can interchange the order of integration and summation under certain conditions?
This interchangeability, formalized in the dominated convergence theorem, relates to the fundamental nature of integrals as limits of sums. When certain conditions are met, the limit process in the integral definition can be interchanged with a summation. This concept is crucial in advanced calculus and analysis.
25. How does the concept of definite integral as a limit of sum relate to the idea of continuous probability distributions?
In continuous probability distributions, the probability of a range of outcomes is given by the area under the probability density function curve. This area is calculated using a definite integral, which can be thought of as the limit of summing probabilities of infinitesimally small intervals across the range.
26. Can you explain how the definite integral as a limit of sum relates to the concept of flux in vector calculus?
Flux represents the flow of a vector field through a surface. When calculated over a surface, it's essentially the limit of summing the dot product of the vector field with small area elements as these elements become infinitesimally small. This directly relates to the concept of definite integral as a limit of sum, extended to higher dimensions.
27. How does understanding definite integrals as limits of sums help in grasping the concept of arc length?
Arc length is calculated by integrating the length of infinitesimal line segments along a curve. This can be visualized as the limit of summing the lengths of small straight-line approximations as they become infinitesimally small, directly connecting to the concept of definite integral as a limit of sum.
28. Why is it important to understand the definite integral as a limit of sum when dealing with functions of several variables?
In multivariable calculus, integrals over regions in two or three dimensions are defined as limits of sums over increasingly fine partitions of the region. Understanding this concept helps in visualizing and computing these higher-dimensional integrals, which are crucial in physics and engineering applications.
29. How does the concept of definite integral as a limit of sum help in understanding the properties of definite integrals, such as additivity over intervals?
The additivity property of definite integrals (that the integral over [a,c] equals the sum of integrals over [a,b] and [b,c]) becomes intuitive when thinking of integrals as limits of sums. It's essentially combining two infinite sums, which naturally add up to the sum over the entire interval.
30. Can you explain how the definite integral as a limit of sum relates to the concept of center of mass in physics?
The center of mass is calculated using integrals that represent the weighted average position of an object's mass. This can be understood as the limit of summing the positions of infinitesimal mass elements, each weighted by its mass, as these elements become infinitely small. This directly relates to the concept of definite integral as a limit of sum.
31. How does the concept of definite integral as a limit of sum help in understanding the derivation of volume formulas, such as the volume of a sphere?
Volume formulas can be derived by integrating the areas of thin cross-sections. This process can be visualized as the limit of summing the volumes of thin slices as they become infinitesimally thin. Understanding integrals as limits of sums makes this process more intuitive and helps explain why these formulas work.
32. Why is it important to understand the definite integral as a limit of sum when studying differential equations?
Many solutions to differential equations involve integrals. Understanding these integrals as limits of sums helps in visualizing how the solution accumulates over time or space. This is particularly useful in physical applications where the differential equation models a rate of change and the integral represents the total accumulation.
33. How does the concept of definite integral as a limit of sum relate to the idea of path independence in conservative vector fields?
In a conservative vector field, the work done along any path between two points is path-independent. This can be understood through the limit of sum concept: the work is the limit of summing infinitesimal amounts of work along the path. Path independence implies that this limit gives the same result regardless of the path chosen.
34. Can you explain how the definite integral as a limit of sum helps in understanding the concept of work-energy theorem in physics?
The work-energy theorem states that the work done on an object equals its change in kinetic energy. This can be derived by integrating force with respect to displacement. Understanding this integral as a limit of sum helps visualize how small amounts of work accumulate to produce the total change in energy.
35. How does understanding definite integrals as limits of sums help in grasping the concept of moments and centroids in engineering?
Moments and centroids involve weighted averages of mass or area distributions. These are calculated using integrals, which can be thought of as limits of sums of infinitesimal contributions. This perspective helps in visualizing how the distribution of mass or area affects the final result.
36. Why is it important to understand the definite integral as a limit of sum when studying Fourier series and transforms?
Fourier series and transforms involve integrals that represent the decomposition of a function into sinusoidal components. Understanding these integrals as limits of sums helps in visualizing how the continuous function is approximated by a sum (or integral) of simple oscillating functions.
37. How does the concept of definite integral as a limit of sum relate to the idea of expected value in probability theory?
The expected value of a continuous random variable is defined as an integral of the product of the variable and its probability density function. This can be understood as the limit of summing the products of possible values and their probabilities as we consider infinitely many infinitesimal probability intervals.
38. Can you explain how the definite integral as a limit of sum helps in understanding the concept of power in electrical engineering?
In AC circuits, average power is calculated by integrating the product of voltage and current over a cycle. This integral can be visualized as the limit of summing infinitesimal amounts of energy transferred over tiny time intervals, helping to understand how power is delivered in oscillating systems.
39. How does understanding definite integrals as limits of sums help in grasping the concept of fluid pressure and force on submerged surfaces?
The force on a submerged surface is calculated by integrating pressure over the surface area. This can be visualized as the limit of summing the forces on infinitesimal area elements as they become infinitely small, directly relating to the concept of definite integral as a limit of sum.
40. Why is it important to understand the definite integral as a limit of sum when studying heat transfer and thermodynamics?
Many concepts in thermodynamics, such as total heat transfer or work done in a thermodynamic cycle, involve integrals. Understanding these as limits of sums helps in visualizing how small amounts of heat or work accumulate over a process, providing a more intuitive grasp of these abstract concepts.
41. How does the concept of definite integral as a limit of sum relate to the idea of continuous compound interest in finance?
Continuous compound interest is modeled using the exponential function, which arises as the limit of discrete compounding as the compounding frequency approaches infinity. This limit process is analogous to the limit of sum in definite integrals, helping to connect the discrete and continuous models of interest accumulation.
42. Can you explain how the definite integral as a limit of sum helps in understanding the concept of impulse in physics?
Impulse is defined as the integral of force over time. This can be visualized as the limit of summing small changes in momentum (force * small time interval) as the time intervals become infinitesimally small. This directly relates to the concept of definite integral as a limit of sum and helps explain why impulse

Articles

sir when i am opening viteee knockout  5000 concepts matrices and its aplication chapter it opens complex number pls do help

they are not showing any option

when is vit entrance examination 2020?

Arrange the following Cobalt complexes in the order of incresing Crystal Field Stabilization Energy (CFSE) value. Complexes :  

\mathrm{\underset{\textbf{A}}{\left [ CoF_{6} \right ]^{3-}},\underset{\textbf{B}}{\left [ Co\left ( H_{2}O \right )_{6} \right ]^{2+}},\underset{\textbf{C}}{\left [ Co\left ( NH_{3} \right )_{6} \right ]^{3+}}\: and\: \ \underset{\textbf{D}}{\left [ Co\left ( en \right )_{3} \right ]^{3+}}}

Choose the correct option :
Option: 1 \mathrm{B< C< D< A}
Option: 2 \mathrm{B< A< C< D}
Option: 3 \mathrm{A< B< C< D}
Option: 4 \mathrm{C< D< B< A}

The type of hybridisation and magnetic property of the complex \left[\mathrm{MnCl}_{6}\right]^{3-}, respectively, are :
Option: 1 \mathrm{sp ^{3} d ^{2} \text { and diamagnetic }}
Option: 2 \mathrm{sp ^{3} d ^{2} \text { and diamagnetic }}
Option: 3 \mathrm{sp ^{3} d ^{2} \text { and diamagnetic }}
Option: 4 \mathrm{sp ^{3} d ^{2} \text { and diamagnetic }}
Option: 5 \mathrm{d ^{2} sp ^{3} \text { and diamagnetic }}
Option: 6 \mathrm{d ^{2} sp ^{3} \text { and diamagnetic }}
Option: 7 \mathrm{d ^{2} sp ^{3} \text { and diamagnetic }}
Option: 8 \mathrm{d ^{2} sp ^{3} \text { and diamagnetic }}
Option: 9 \mathrm{d ^{2} sp ^{3} \text { and paramagnetic }}
Option: 10 \mathrm{d ^{2} sp ^{3} \text { and paramagnetic }}
Option: 11 \mathrm{d ^{2} sp ^{3} \text { and paramagnetic }}
Option: 12 \mathrm{d ^{2} sp ^{3} \text { and paramagnetic }}
Option: 13 \mathrm{sp ^{3} d ^{2} \text { and paramagnetic }}
Option: 14 \mathrm{sp ^{3} d ^{2} \text { and paramagnetic }}
Option: 15 \mathrm{sp ^{3} d ^{2} \text { and paramagnetic }}
Option: 16 \mathrm{sp ^{3} d ^{2} \text { and paramagnetic }}
The number of geometrical isomers found in the metal complexes \mathrm{\left[ PtCl _{2}\left( NH _{3}\right)_{2}\right],\left[ Ni ( CO )_{4}\right], \left[ Ru \left( H _{2} O \right)_{3} Cl _{3}\right] \text { and }\left[ CoCl _{2}\left( NH _{3}\right)_{4}\right]^{+}} respectively, are :
Option: 1 1,1,1,1
Option: 2 1,1,1,1
Option: 3 1,1,1,1
Option: 4 1,1,1,1
Option: 5 2,1,2,2
Option: 6 2,1,2,2
Option: 7 2,1,2,2
Option: 8 2,1,2,2
Option: 9 2,0,2,2
Option: 10 2,0,2,2
Option: 11 2,0,2,2
Option: 12 2,0,2,2
Option: 13 2,1,2,1
Option: 14 2,1,2,1
Option: 15 2,1,2,1
Option: 16 2,1,2,1
Spin only magnetic moment of an octahedral complex of \mathrm{Fe}^{2+} in the presence of a strong field ligand in BM is :
Option: 1 4.89
Option: 2 4.89
Option: 3 4.89
Option: 4 4.89
Option: 5 2.82
Option: 6 2.82
Option: 7 2.82
Option: 8 2.82
Option: 9 0
Option: 10 0
Option: 11 0
Option: 12 0
Option: 13 3.46
Option: 14 3.46
Option: 15 3.46
Option: 16 3.46

3 moles of metal complex with formula \mathrm{Co}(\mathrm{en})_{2} \mathrm{Cl}_{3} gives 3 moles of silver chloride on treatment with excess of silver nitrate. The secondary valency of CO in the complex is_______.
(Round off to the nearest integer)
 

The overall stability constant of the complex ion \mathrm{\left [ Cu\left ( NH_{3} \right )_{4} \right ]^{2+}} is 2.1\times 10^{1 3}. The overall dissociation constant is y\times 10^{-14}. Then y is ___________(Nearest integer)
 

Identify the correct order of solubility in aqueous medium:

Option: 1

Na2S > ZnS > CuS


Option: 2

CuS > ZnS > Na2S


Option: 3

ZnS > Na2S > CuS


Option: 4

Na2S > CuS > ZnS


Back to top