Question : Directions: In this question, a part of the sentence is in bold. Below are given alternatives to the bold part at (1), (2), and (3) which may improve the sentence. Choose the correct alternative in case no improvement is needed your answer is (4).
The receptionist asked the patient, "Who recommended you to Dr. Paulson?"
Option 1: 1
Option 2: 2
Option 3: 3
Option 4: 4
Latest: SSC CGL 2024 final Result Out | SSC CGL preparation tips to crack the exam
Don't Miss: SSC CGL Tier 1 Scorecard 2024 Released | SSC CGL complete guide
Suggested: Month-wise Current Affairs | Upcoming Government Exams
Correct Answer: 2
Solution : The correct choice is the second option.
Referred is the appropriate word to use in this context, as it means someone directed the patient to see Dr. Paulson for medical treatment. It accurately conveys the intended meaning.
The meanings of other options are as follows:
So, the correct sentence should be: The receptionist asked the patient, "Who referred you to Dr. Paulson?"
Candidates can download this ebook to know all about SSC CGL.
Admit Card | Eligibility | Application | Selection Process | Preparation Tips | Result | Answer Key
Question : Directions: In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the alternative that will improve the bold part of the sentence. In case no improvement is needed, select "No Improvement".
A chance remark by her friend transported her life.
Question : Directions: In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the alternative that will improve the bracketed part of the sentence. In case no improvement is needed, select "No Improvement".
Someone must (being) killed.
Question : Directions: A sentence or a part of the sentence is printed in bold. Below are alternatives to the bold part that may improve the sentence. Choose the correct alternative. In case no improvement is needed, choose "No Improvement".
The tribunal noted that the driver of the offend truck did not lead any evidence in rebuttal of claims.
While two judges in the majority said the practice was arbitrary and, therefore, unconstitutional, the third judge called it legally.
It also indicates the caveats and failure modes in the model need to be improved before been used independently.
Regular exam updates, QnA, Predictors, College Applications & E-books now on your Mobile