Question : Read the passage given below and then answer the questions given below the passage. Read carefully.

Pakistani officials have threatened to use nuclear weapons should India invade, after India's new army chief admitted to clandestine military plans for attacking its neighbour in the event of a crisis.
Three officials in Islamabad have revealed that Pakistan would take all necessary measures to defend itself should India ever put into action Iong-rumoured "cold-start" plans to attack Pakistani territory following an event such as a major terrorist incident. "If ever our national security is threatened by advancing foreign forces, Pakistan will use all of its weapons - and I mean all of our weapons - to defend our country" one of the officials said. The comments came two weeks after Bipin Rawat, the newly appointed head of the Indian army, acknowledged the existence of "cold start"
The cold-start strategy is designed to enable an instant response to crisis including attacks by militants launched from Pakistani soil, and would mean Indian troops entering Pakistan and occupying positions along the border before Islamabad could prepare or the international community could intervene. The arms build-up in the region has raised the nuclear stakes.
According to a 2010 diplomatic cable from the then US ambassador in New Delhi released by WikiLeaks, the plan is designed to enable a rapid response to a crisis without threatening the survival of the Palistani state - or triggering a nuclear response. Tensions between the two nuclear-armed neighbours have remained high since last September's attack on the Indian army base at Uri in Kashmir, which killed 19 soldiers.

India responded with what it called "surgical strikes" across the de facto border with Pakistan. Since then there have been more minor assaults. India's National Investigation Agency on Thursday said the militant Islamist group Lashkar-e-Taiba was to blame for the Uri attack.
This month, meanwhile, Pakistan carried out its first test of a nuclearcapable missile from a submarine. Uri attack has refocussed Indian attention on how it responds to terror attacks that it believes originate from Paljistan, such as those in Mumbai in 2008 and at the Indian parliament in $2001 .$

While India has never before acknowledged the cold-start retaliation doctrine, Pakistan has used rumours of its existence to justify keeping its defences high on the Indian border, even as its foreign partners have urged it to redeploy troops to fight lslamists elsewhere. India refrains from nuclear attacks as not only will it lead to irreparable destruction but also be against india's theory of 'judicious use' of nuclear weapons validated through several treaties signed by it,

"It is understandable in the wake of the surgical strikes that the Modi government would want to signal to Pakistan that all options are on the table in the event of another terror attack within India," said Walter Ladvig, a lecturer in international relations at King's College, London. "However, reviving cold start - if that is what has happened certainly escalates the rhetoric, and may raise unrealistic expectations domestically about India's ability to respond to a new terror attack"

Mahmud Durrani, a former national security adviser to the Pakistani prime minister, said: "Pakistan already fears a rapid build-up of India's conventional weapons. The danger is that with such wamings [of cold start], the escalatory ladder of going from conventional weapons to nuclear weapons for Pakistan will be shortened. "Western diplomats in Islamabad, however, doubt whether India would use the cold-start plan.

"Right now, its more psychological," said one. "But that's not to say that we shouldn't worry about this situation. India and Pakistan both have nuclear weapons. Going by the books, the two nuclear states cannot afford a war, but there is always uncertainty."

Question:

What was the reason due to which Pakistan issued this bold statement?

Option 1: India's surgical strikes.
 

Option 2: India's threat to plan more strikes like uri
 

Option 3: India accepting existence of secret attack plans.
 

Option 4: Continuous terrorist attack 

Question : Read the passage given below and then answer the questions given below the passage. Read carefully.

Pakistani officials have threatened to use nuclear weapons should India invade, after India's new army chief admitted to clandestine military plans for attacking its neighbour in the event of a crisis.
Three officials in Islamabad have revealed that Pakistan would take all necessary measures to defend itself should India ever put into action Iong-rumoured "cold-start" plans to attack Pakistani territory following an event such as a major terrorist incident. "If ever our national security is threatened by advancing foreign forces, Pakistan will use all of its weapons - and I mean all of our weapons - to defend our country" one of the officials said. The comments came two weeks after Bipin Rawat, the newly appointed head of the Indian army, acknowledged the existence of "cold start"
The cold-start strategy is designed to enable an instant response to crisis including attacks by militants launched from Pakistani soil, and would mean Indian troops entering Pakistan and occupying positions along the border before Islamabad could prepare or the international community could intervene. The arms build-up in the region has raised the nuclear stakes.
According to a 2010 diplomatic cable from the then US ambassador in New Delhi released by WikiLeaks, the plan is designed to enable a rapid response to a crisis without threatening the survival of the Palistani state - or triggering a nuclear response. Tensions between the two nuclear-armed neighbours have remained high since last September's attack on the Indian army base at Uri in Kashmir, which killed 19 soldiers.

India responded with what it called "surgical strikes" across the de facto border with Pakistan. Since then there have been more minor assaults. India's National Investigation Agency on Thursday said the militant Islamist group Lashkar-e-Taiba was to blame for the Uri attack.
This month, meanwhile, Pakistan carried out its first test of a nuclearcapable missile from a submarine. Uri attack has refocussed Indian attention on how it responds to terror attacks that it believes originate from Paljistan, such as those in Mumbai in 2008 and at the Indian parliament in $2001 .$

While India has never before acknowledged the cold-start retaliation doctrine, Pakistan has used rumours of its existence to justify keeping its defences high on the Indian border, even as its foreign partners have urged it to redeploy troops to fight lslamists elsewhere. India refrains from nuclear attacks as not only will it lead to irreparable destruction but also be against india's theory of 'judicious use' of nuclear weapons validated through several treaties signed by it,

"It is understandable in the wake of the surgical strikes that the Modi government would want to signal to Pakistan that all options are on the table in the event of another terror attack within India," said Walter Ladvig, a lecturer in international relations at King's College, London. "However, reviving cold start - if that is what has happened certainly escalates the rhetoric, and may raise unrealistic expectations domestically about India's ability to respond to a new terror attack"

Mahmud Durrani, a former national security adviser to the Pakistani prime minister, said: "Pakistan already fears a rapid build-up of India's conventional weapons. The danger is that with such wamings [of cold start], the escalatory ladder of going from conventional weapons to nuclear weapons for Pakistan will be shortened. "Western diplomats in Islamabad, however, doubt whether India would use the cold-start plan.

"Right now, its more psychological," said one. "But that's not to say that we shouldn't worry about this situation. India and Pakistan both have nuclear weapons. Going by the books, the two nuclear states cannot afford a war, but there is always uncertainty."

Question:

What is the main reason behind the fact that all the decisions which are connected with Pakistan includes Islamabad?

Option 1: It is the base of major terrorist camps
 

Option 2:  It is the capital of Pakistan.
 

Option 3: It houses all nuclear facilities of the country.

 

Option 4: Islamabad was targeted for majority of the surgical strikes 

Question : Read the passage given below and then answer the questions given below the passage. Read carefully.

Pakistani officials have threatened to use nuclear weapons should India invade, after India's new army chief admitted to clandestine military plans for attacking its neighbour in the event of a crisis.
Three officials in Islamabad have revealed that Pakistan would take all necessary measures to defend itself should India ever put into action Iong-rumoured "cold-start" plans to attack Pakistani territory following an event such as a major terrorist incident. "If ever our national security is threatened by advancing foreign forces, Pakistan will use all of its weapons - and I mean all of our weapons - to defend our country" one of the officials said. The comments came two weeks after Bipin Rawat, the newly appointed head of the Indian army, acknowledged the existence of "cold start"
The cold-start strategy is designed to enable an instant response to crisis including attacks by militants launched from Pakistani soil, and would mean Indian troops entering Pakistan and occupying positions along the border before Islamabad could prepare or the international community could intervene. The arms build-up in the region has raised the nuclear stakes.
According to a 2010 diplomatic cable from the then US ambassador in New Delhi released by WikiLeaks, the plan is designed to enable a rapid response to a crisis without threatening the survival of the Palistani state - or triggering a nuclear response. Tensions between the two nuclear-armed neighbours have remained high since last September's attack on the Indian army base at Uri in Kashmir, which killed 19 soldiers.

India responded with what it called "surgical strikes" across the de facto border with Pakistan. Since then there have been more minor assaults. India's National Investigation Agency on Thursday said the militant Islamist group Lashkar-e-Taiba was to blame for the Uri attack.
This month, meanwhile, Pakistan carried out its first test of a nuclearcapable missile from a submarine. Uri attack has refocussed Indian attention on how it responds to terror attacks that it believes originate from Paljistan, such as those in Mumbai in 2008 and at the Indian parliament in $2001 .$

While India has never before acknowledged the cold-start retaliation doctrine, Pakistan has used rumours of its existence to justify keeping its defences high on the Indian border, even as its foreign partners have urged it to redeploy troops to fight lslamists elsewhere. India refrains from nuclear attacks as not only will it lead to irreparable destruction but also be against india's theory of 'judicious use' of nuclear weapons validated through several treaties signed by it,

"It is understandable in the wake of the surgical strikes that the Modi government would want to signal to Pakistan that all options are on the table in the event of another terror attack within India," said Walter Ladvig, a lecturer in international relations at King's College, London. "However, reviving cold start - if that is what has happened certainly escalates the rhetoric, and may raise unrealistic expectations domestically about India's ability to respond to a new terror attack"

Mahmud Durrani, a former national security adviser to the Pakistani prime minister, said: "Pakistan already fears a rapid build-up of India's conventional weapons. The danger is that with such wamings [of cold start], the escalatory ladder of going from conventional weapons to nuclear weapons for Pakistan will be shortened. "Western diplomats in Islamabad, however, doubt whether India would use the cold-start plan.

"Right now, its more psychological," said one. "But that's not to say that we shouldn't worry about this situation. India and Pakistan both have nuclear weapons. Going by the books, the two nuclear states cannot afford a war, but there is always uncertainty."

Question:

What was the plan of action executed by India in response to the Uri attacks? 

Option 1: Attacking specific Pakistan military areas.

Option 2: Giving out a public statement regarding Lashkar-e-Taiba.
 

Option 3: Filing petition International Court of Justice.

Option 4: Conducting attacks on terrorist base camps across the border in a way that results in minimum collateral damage.

Question : Read the passage given below and then answer the questions given below the passage. Read carefully.

Pakistani officials have threatened to use nuclear weapons should India invade, after India's new army chief admitted to clandestine military plans for attacking its neighbour in the event of a crisis.
Three officials in Islamabad have revealed that Pakistan would take all necessary measures to defend itself should India ever put into action Iong-rumoured "cold-start" plans to attack Pakistani territory following an event such as a major terrorist incident. "If ever our national security is threatened by advancing foreign forces, Pakistan will use all of its weapons - and I mean all of our weapons - to defend our country" one of the officials said. The comments came two weeks after Bipin Rawat, the newly appointed head of the Indian army, acknowledged the existence of "cold start"
The cold-start strategy is designed to enable an instant response to crisis including attacks by militants launched from Pakistani soil, and would mean Indian troops entering Pakistan and occupying positions along the border before Islamabad could prepare or the international community could intervene. The arms build-up in the region has raised the nuclear stakes.
According to a 2010 diplomatic cable from the then US ambassador in New Delhi released by WikiLeaks, the plan is designed to enable a rapid response to a crisis without threatening the survival of the Palistani state - or triggering a nuclear response. Tensions between the two nuclear-armed neighbours have remained high since last September's attack on the Indian army base at Uri in Kashmir, which killed 19 soldiers.

India responded with what it called "surgical strikes" across the de facto border with Pakistan. Since then there have been more minor assaults. India's National Investigation Agency on Thursday said the militant Islamist group Lashkar-e-Taiba was to blame for the Uri attack.
This month, meanwhile, Pakistan carried out its first test of a nuclearcapable missile from a submarine. Uri attack has refocussed Indian attention on how it responds to terror attacks that it believes originate from Paljistan, such as those in Mumbai in 2008 and at the Indian parliament in $2001 .$

While India has never before acknowledged the cold-start retaliation doctrine, Pakistan has used rumours of its existence to justify keeping its defences high on the Indian border, even as its foreign partners have urged it to redeploy troops to fight lslamists elsewhere. India refrains from nuclear attacks as not only will it lead to irreparable destruction but also be against india's theory of 'judicious use' of nuclear weapons validated through several treaties signed by it,

"It is understandable in the wake of the surgical strikes that the Modi government would want to signal to Pakistan that all options are on the table in the event of another terror attack within India," said Walter Ladvig, a lecturer in international relations at King's College, London. "However, reviving cold start - if that is what has happened certainly escalates the rhetoric, and may raise unrealistic expectations domestically about India's ability to respond to a new terror attack"

Mahmud Durrani, a former national security adviser to the Pakistani prime minister, said: "Pakistan already fears a rapid build-up of India's conventional weapons. The danger is that with such wamings [of cold start], the escalatory ladder of going from conventional weapons to nuclear weapons for Pakistan will be shortened. "Western diplomats in Islamabad, however, doubt whether India would use the cold-start plan.

"Right now, its more psychological," said one. "But that's not to say that we shouldn't worry about this situation. India and Pakistan both have nuclear weapons. Going by the books, the two nuclear states cannot afford a war, but there is always uncertainty."

Question:

Choose the word which is the closest in meaning to the phrase "Going by the books?"

Option 1: Investigating.
 

Option 2: Not following procedure.
 

Option 3: Obeying the rules.
 

Option 4: Contemporary
 

Question : Read the passage given below and then answer the questions given below the passage. Read carefully.

Pakistani officials have threatened to use nuclear weapons should India invade, after India's new army chief admitted to clandestine military plans for attacking its neighbour in the event of a crisis.
Three officials in Islamabad have revealed that Pakistan would take all necessary measures to defend itself should India ever put into action Iong-rumoured "cold-start" plans to attack Pakistani territory following an event such as a major terrorist incident. "If ever our national security is threatened by advancing foreign forces, Pakistan will use all of its weapons - and I mean all of our weapons - to defend our country" one of the officials said. The comments came two weeks after Bipin Rawat, the newly appointed head of the Indian army, acknowledged the existence of "cold start"
The cold-start strategy is designed to enable an instant response to crisis including attacks by militants launched from Pakistani soil, and would mean Indian troops entering Pakistan and occupying positions along the border before Islamabad could prepare or the international community could intervene. The arms build-up in the region has raised the nuclear stakes.
According to a 2010 diplomatic cable from the then US ambassador in New Delhi released by WikiLeaks, the plan is designed to enable a rapid response to a crisis without threatening the survival of the Palistani state - or triggering a nuclear response. Tensions between the two nuclear-armed neighbours have remained high since last September's attack on the Indian army base at Uri in Kashmir, which killed 19 soldiers.

India responded with what it called "surgical strikes" across the de facto border with Pakistan. Since then there have been more minor assaults. India's National Investigation Agency on Thursday said the militant Islamist group Lashkar-e-Taiba was to blame for the Uri attack.
This month, meanwhile, Pakistan carried out its first test of a nuclearcapable missile from a submarine. Uri attack has refocussed Indian attention on how it responds to terror attacks that it believes originate from Paljistan, such as those in Mumbai in 2008 and at the Indian parliament in $2001 .$

While India has never before acknowledged the cold-start retaliation doctrine, Pakistan has used rumours of its existence to justify keeping its defences high on the Indian border, even as its foreign partners have urged it to redeploy troops to fight lslamists elsewhere. India refrains from nuclear attacks as not only will it lead to irreparable destruction but also be against india's theory of 'judicious use' of nuclear weapons validated through several treaties signed by it,

"It is understandable in the wake of the surgical strikes that the Modi government would want to signal to Pakistan that all options are on the table in the event of another terror attack within India," said Walter Ladvig, a lecturer in international relations at King's College, London. "However, reviving cold start - if that is what has happened certainly escalates the rhetoric, and may raise unrealistic expectations domestically about India's ability to respond to a new terror attack"

Mahmud Durrani, a former national security adviser to the Pakistani prime minister, said: "Pakistan already fears a rapid build-up of India's conventional weapons. The danger is that with such wamings [of cold start], the escalatory ladder of going from conventional weapons to nuclear weapons for Pakistan will be shortened. "Western diplomats in Islamabad, however, doubt whether India would use the cold-start plan.

"Right now, its more psychological," said one. "But that's not to say that we shouldn't worry about this situation. India and Pakistan both have nuclear weapons. Going by the books, the two nuclear states cannot afford a war, but there is always uncertainty."

Question:

How does Pakistan justify the positioning of troops at the border which are uaully  considered to be attack minded ?

Option 1: It does not want a repeat of Uri attacks.
 

Option 2:  It is being cautious due to the rumoured existence of India's cold start strategy.
 

Option 3: They want to prevent cross border terrorism.


 

Option 4: It is using the position to prepare itself to counter the nuclear attack of India.