Question : The idea of a 'committed' judiciary during the Crisis of the Constitutional Order was criticized for:

Option 1: Promoting judicial activism

Option 2: Encouraging judicial independence

Option 3: Undermining the separation of powers

Option 4: Enhancing the efficiency of the judiciary

Question : The concept of a 'committed' judiciary during the Crisis of the Constitutional Order was seen as a challenge to:

Option 1: The principle of judicial review

Option 2: The efficiency of the court system

Option 3: The independence of the judiciary

Option 4: The accessibility of legal services

Question : A 'committed' judiciary during the Crisis of the Constitutional Order was perceived as:

Option 1: A protector of civil liberties

Option 2: An impartial arbiter of justice

Option 3: A supporter of the government's agenda

Option 4: A promoter of judicial activism

Question : A 'committed' judiciary during the Crisis of the Constitutional Order was expected to:

Option 1: Uphold the rule of law

Option 2: Provide checks and balances

Option 3: Support the government's political agenda

Option 4: Ensure judicial independence

Question : The term 'committed' judiciary during the Crisis of the Constitutional Order implied that the judiciary was expected to:

Option 1: Remain independent and impartial

Option 2: Support the government's policies without question

Option 3: Speed up the process of delivering justice

Option 4: Focus on social justice