Question : Case Study 1:

Mr. Sharma purchased a mobile phone online, but it stopped working after just one week. He contacted the seller for a replacement, but they refused to take any action. Which right of the consumer has been violated in this case?

 

Option 1: Right to be heard

Option 2: Right to safety

Option 3: Right to seek redressal

Option 4: Right to choose

Question : Case Study 1:

Mr. Sharma purchased a mobile phone online, but it stopped working after just one week. He contacted the seller for a replacement, but they refused to take any action. Which right of the consumer has been violated in this case?

Option 1: Right to be heard

Option 2: Right to safety

Option 3: Right to seek redressal

Option 4: Right to choose

Question : Case Study 1:

Mr. Sharma purchased a mobile phone online, but it stopped working after just one week. He contacted the seller for a replacement, but they refused to take any action. Which right of the consumer has been violated in this case?

Option 1: Right to be heard

Option 2: Right to safety

Option 3: Right to seek redressal

Option 4: Right to choose

Question : Case Study 25:

A consumer bought a branded mobile phone, and within a week, it developed a major technical flaw. The consumer approached the manufacturer for repair or replacement, but they refused to take any action. What right of the consumer has been violated in this case?

Option 1: Right to be informed

Option 2: Right to seek redressal

Option 3: Right to safety

Option 4: Right to choose

Question : Case Study 25:

A consumer bought a branded mobile phone, and within a week, it developed a major technical flaw. The consumer approached the manufacturer for repair or replacement, but they refused to take any action. What right of the consumer has been violated in this case?

Option 1: Right to be informed

Option 2: Right to seek redressal

Option 3: Right to safety

Option 4: Right to choose

Question : Case Study 25:

A consumer bought a branded mobile phone, and within a week, it developed a major technical flaw. The consumer approached the manufacturer for repair or replacement, but they refused to take any action. What right of the consumer has been violated in this case?

Option 1: Right to be informed

Option 2: Right to seek redressal

Option 3: Right to safety

Option 4: Right to choose