Question : Directions: In the following question, a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true, even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, follows from the given statement.
Statement:
Should rock shows be allowed to run till midnight at tourist places?
Arguments:
I. Yes, more tourists arrive due to rock shows. Tourism is good for the local economy.
II. No, local traditions are harmed due to tourism.
Option 1: If only argument I is strong
Option 2: If only argument II is strong
Option 3: If both I and II are strong
Option 4: If neither I nor II is strong
Correct Answer: If only argument I is strong
Solution :
According to the given statement –
Argument I:
Yes, more tourists arrive due to rock shows. Tourism is good for the local economy – If rock shows attract more tourists, and tourism is beneficial for the local economy, allowing rock shows till midnight supports economic growth. Therefore, this argument strongly supports the given statement.
Argument II:
No, local traditions are harmed due to tourism – The statement doesn't mention any direct conflict between local traditions and tourism. Therefore, argument II does not support the given statement.
Therefore, the only argument I is strongly support the given statement. Hence, the first option is correct.
Related Questions
Know More about
Staff Selection Commission Combined Grad ...
Answer Key | Eligibility | Application | Selection Process | Preparation Tips | Result | Admit Card
Get Updates BrochureYour Staff Selection Commission Combined Graduate Level Exam brochure has been successfully mailed to your registered email id “”.



