Careers360 Logo
ask-icon
share

    Compare Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology Kanpur vs Naini Agricultural Institute Allahabad

    Compare Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur B.Sc Agriculture Hons vs Naini Agricultural Institute, Allahabad B.Sc Agriculture Hons on the basis of their Fees, Placements, Cut Off, Reviews, Seats, Courses, and other details. Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur is rated 3.9 out of 5 by 15 verified students while Naini Agricultural Institute, Allahabad is rated 3.8 out of 5 by 8 verified students at Careers360. Explore Careers360 for detailed comparison on all course parameters and download free information on B.Sc.(Hons) Admission details, Placement report, Eligibility criteria, etc.
    Quick facts
    Menu

    B.Sc Agriculture Hons

    via Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur

    B.Sc Agriculture Hons

    via Naini Agricultural Institute, Allahabad

    Quick Facts

    Location

    Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh
    Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh

    Ownership

    Government
    Government

    Parent Institute

    -

    Type Of Institute

    State University

    -

    College Type

    University
    College

    Establishment Year

    1975
    1910

    Total Courses Offered

    50
    22

    Ranking & Accreditations

    Approvals

    UGC
    Constituent

    Accreditations

    NAAC
    -

    Course & Fees Details

    Course Credential

    Degree
    Degree

    Degree

    B.Sc.(Hons)
    B.Sc.(Hons)

    Branch

    Agricultural Science
    Agricultural Science

    Duration

    4 years
    4 years

    Mode

    Offline
    Offline

    Exams Accepted

    Admission Details

    The admission is based on UPCATET

    -

    Eligibility Criteria

    To be eligible, a candidate must have passed the 10+2 science examination with PCB/PCBM/PCM/10+2 Agriculture having scored not less than 50% marks in aggregate with the condition that candidates coming from different streams must take remedial courses as prescribed.

    ... read more

    The Candidate must have passed in 10+2 with PCM or PCB or PCMB or Inter Ag. (Marks: Minimum 50% in aggregate) shall be eligible for the course.

    Facilities

    Facilities

    Facilities Count

    Alumni Associations

    Auditorium

    Banks/ATMs

    Boys Hostel

    Cafeteria

    Classrooms

    Extra Curricular Activities

    Girls Hostel

    Guest Room/Waiting Room

    Gym

    I.T Infrastructure

    Laboratories

    Library

    Medical/Hospital

    Sports

    Swimming Pool

    Training and Placement Cell

    Wifi

    Alumni Associations

    Boys Hostel

    Cafeteria

    Girls Hostel

    Gym

    Library

    Medical/Hospital

    Sports

    Wifi

    College Reviews & Perception

    College Infrastructure

    Campus Life

    Academics

    Placements

    Value for Money

    Total Reviews

    15
    10

    Individual Reviews

    My experience of writing review is good

    posted on 2 years ago by chhavi

    My experience not good because I am only focusing the study.

    posted on 2 years ago by Prashant patel

    It was great.

    posted on 2 years ago by Abhishek
    Read All Reviews

    All over it is a good university.

    posted on 3 weeks ago by Jayita Sarkar

    Good college which provided me a better direction in life.

    posted on 3 months ago by MAYANK KUMAR SINGH

    Good College

    posted on 2 years ago by Ashwani yadav
    Read All Reviews
    -

    Insight 1/2
    College Reviews & Perception

    Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur has received the lowest rating for value for money whereas Naini Agricultural Institute, Allahabad has comparatively better ratings across all aspects.

    Which college/course would you like to go ahead with?

    Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur

    B.Sc Agriculture Hons

    feed back

    Naini Agricultural Institute, Allahabad

    B.Sc Agriculture Hons

    feed back