some points on coexistence of human and nature
Human–wildlife conflict occurs when the needs and behavior of wildlife impact negatively on humans or when humans negatively affect the needs of wildlife. To explore the nature, causes and mitigations of human wildlife conflict, the coexistence between human and wildlife assessment was conducted around Bale Mountains National Park. Data were collected by means of household questionnaires, focus group discussion, interview, field observation and secondary sources. The nature and extent of human wildlife conflict in the study area were profoundly impacted humans, wild animal and the environment through crop damage, habitat disturbance and destruction, livestock predation, and killing of wildlife and human.
Hey Student...
Some points on Coexistence of human and nature ..
Human–wildlife conflict occurs when wildlife's needs and behaviour have a detrimental impact on humans, or when humans have a negative impact on wildlife's needs. The cohabitation between human and wildlife evaluation was undertaken around Bale Mountains National Park to investigate the nature, causes, and mitigations of human-wildlife conflict.
Household questionnaires, focus group discussions, interviews, field observation, and secondary sources were used to gather data. Humans, wild animals, and the environment were all negatively impacted by the nature and scope of human-wildlife conflict in the study area, which included crop loss, habitat disruption and destruction, livestock predation, and wildlife and human killing.
Agricultural expansion (30%), human settlement (24%), animal overgrazing (14%), deforestation (18%), illegal grass harvest (10%), and poaching (10%) were identified as the key causes of conflict (4 percent ). Crop guarding (34 percent), live fencing (26 percent), scarecrow (22 percent), chasing (14 percent), and smoking have all been used by farmers to combat crop raiders (5 percent ). Fencing (38%), chasing (30%), and scarecrow (20%) are the most popular activities (24 percent )
Human–animal confrontations have harmful consequences for both humans and wildlife, as this study emphasises. As a result, one way to reduce the chances of peaceful coexistence between humans and wildlife is to raise awareness and provide training to local residents, as well as to define a clear boundary between the closure region and the open area.
In general, the researchers recommended that stakeholders and concerned bodies raise public knowledge about the usage of wildlife and human–wildlife conflict mitigation techniques in the local community.
Human–wildlife conflict (HWC) occurs when wildlife's needs and behaviour negatively influence humans, or when humans negatively affect wildlife's requirements. Wildlife may cause conflicts when it damages crops, threatens, kills, or injures people and domestic animals [33]. These are serious issues that have arisen as a result of the rising rural population in and surrounding wildlife areas.
Because human–wildlife conflict is based on the proximity of wildlife, it is common but not uniformly distributed. Furthermore, during different periods of the year, different species produce different forms of damage. The impact of the harm on households' livelihoods varies depending on their level of livelihood security at the time of the catastrophe.
Increased human population near wildlife habitats is one of the key causes of human–wildlife conflict. The frequency and intensity of such confrontations increase as the human population grows and the demand for resources grows.
I hope these points helps.
Regards.




